東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Congestion v Content Provision in Ne...

Tudon Maldonado, Jose Francisco.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Congestion v Content Provision in Net Neutrality: The Case of Amazon's Twitch.tv.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Congestion v Content Provision in Net Neutrality: The Case of Amazon's Twitch.tv./
作者:	Tudon Maldonado, Jose Francisco.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	83 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-01A.
標題:	Economics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10749851
ISBN:	9780438083288

Congestion v Content Provision in Net Neutrality: The Case of Amazon's Twitch.tv.
Tudon Maldonado, Jose Francisco.

Congestion v Content Provision in Net Neutrality: The Case of Amazon's Twitch.tv. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 83 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Net neutrality encourages content provision but also creates congestion externalities from the increase in data traffic. I study the consequences of net neutrality in Twitch.tv, a popular internet platform. Twitch is non-neutral because it gives priority to the most popular content providers by compressing their data, which makes them accessible to more consumers. I estimate a two-sided-market model that considers the interactions between content provision, its consumption, and congestion. Using an exogenous technological upgrade that increased data traffic, I identify the costs of congestion for content providers and for their consumers and, using exogenous time-series variations within panels, I identify the benefits of prioritization. I use the estimated preferences and technological parameters to study the counterfactual in which net neutrality is imposed in the platform, which requires priority to be allocated anonymously. Consumer welfare drops 5%, whereas content provision does not increase, but its average quality drops. I then consider a counterfactual rent-extractive platform that charges for prioritization under the non-neutral regime. In this case, net neutrality, which prohibits priority charges, increases content provision, but consumer welfare still drops due to lower content quality and congestion externalities.

ISBN: 9780438083288Subjects--Topical Terms:

517137
Economics.

Congestion v Content Provision in Net Neutrality: The Case of Amazon's Twitch.tv.
LDR:02415nmm a2200325 4500 001 2206116
005 20190828133603.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438083288
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10749851
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uchicago:14227
035 $a AAI10749851
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Tudon Maldonado, Jose Francisco. $3 3433010
245 1 0 $a Congestion v Content Provision in Net Neutrality: The Case of Amazon's Twitch.tv.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 83 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Hortacsu, Ali.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Net neutrality encourages content provision but also creates congestion externalities from the increase in data traffic. I study the consequences of net neutrality in Twitch.tv, a popular internet platform. Twitch is non-neutral because it gives priority to the most popular content providers by compressing their data, which makes them accessible to more consumers. I estimate a two-sided-market model that considers the interactions between content provision, its consumption, and congestion. Using an exogenous technological upgrade that increased data traffic, I identify the costs of congestion for content providers and for their consumers and, using exogenous time-series variations within panels, I identify the benefits of prioritization. I use the estimated preferences and technological parameters to study the counterfactual in which net neutrality is imposed in the platform, which requires priority to be allocated anonymously. Consumer welfare drops 5%, whereas content provision does not increase, but its average quality drops. I then consider a counterfactual rent-extractive platform that charges for prioritization under the non-neutral regime. In this case, net neutrality, which prohibits priority charges, increases content provision, but consumer welfare still drops due to lower content quality and congestion externalities.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Economics. $3 517137
650 4 $a Web Studies. $3 1026830
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a The University of Chicago. $b Economics. $3 1672980
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-01A.
790 $a 0330
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10749851