東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Intellectual Property is Not Propert...

Billingsley, Evan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Intellectual Property is Not Property: Copyright and the Culture of Owning a Myth.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Intellectual Property is Not Property: Copyright and the Culture of Owning a Myth./
作者:	Billingsley, Evan.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	201 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International80-04A(E).
標題:	Mass communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10974525
ISBN:	9780438712706

Intellectual Property is Not Property: Copyright and the Culture of Owning a Myth.
Billingsley, Evan.

Intellectual Property is Not Property: Copyright and the Culture of Owning a Myth. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 201 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.

The purpose of this study is to explore the shifting cultural norms of copyright law, and that concept's impact on the performance and practice of artists producing original works of authorship. Although related concepts predate it, and today it exists as a subset of a broader category known as intellectual property, the purpose of copyright beginning with the United States Constitution was to allow for a temporary economic monopoly to an author of a fixed creative work. This monopoly was meant to incentivize authors to contribute to the public good with works that promote progress in science and art. However, increases over time in the scope and duration of copyright terms grant broader protections and controls for copyright owners today, while advances in technology have provided the public with the potential for near-limitless low-cost access to information. This creates a conflict between proprietary interest in creative works and the public's right and ability to access and build on those works. The history of copyright law in America is rife with efforts to balance these competing interests.

ISBN: 9780438712706Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144804
Mass communication.

Intellectual Property is Not Property: Copyright and the Culture of Owning a Myth.
LDR:03306nmm a2200325 4500 001 2205083
005 20190718114220.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438712706
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10974525
035 $a (MiAaPQ)asu:18315
035 $a AAI10974525
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Billingsley, Evan. $3 3431947
245 1 0 $a Intellectual Property is Not Property: Copyright and the Culture of Owning a Myth.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 201 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Joseph Russomanno.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.
520 $a The purpose of this study is to explore the shifting cultural norms of copyright law, and that concept's impact on the performance and practice of artists producing original works of authorship. Although related concepts predate it, and today it exists as a subset of a broader category known as intellectual property, the purpose of copyright beginning with the United States Constitution was to allow for a temporary economic monopoly to an author of a fixed creative work. This monopoly was meant to incentivize authors to contribute to the public good with works that promote progress in science and art. However, increases over time in the scope and duration of copyright terms grant broader protections and controls for copyright owners today, while advances in technology have provided the public with the potential for near-limitless low-cost access to information. This creates a conflict between proprietary interest in creative works and the public's right and ability to access and build on those works. The history of copyright law in America is rife with efforts to balance these competing interests.
520 $a The methodology for this study consisted of flexible strategies for collecting and analyzing data, primarily elite, semi-structured interviews with professional artists, attorneys, and others who engage with the cultural and legal norms of intellectual property regimes on a regular basis. Constant comparative analysis was used to maintain an emic perspective, prioritizing the subjective experience of individuals interviewed for this research project. Additional methods for qualitative analysis were also employed here to code and categorize gathered data, including the use of RQDA, a software package for Qualitative Data Analysis that runs within the R statistical software program. Various patterns and behaviors relevant to intellectual property reforms as they relate to artist practices were discussed in detail following the analysis of findings, in an effort to describe how cultural norms of copyright intersect with the creation of original works of authorship, and towards the development of the theory that the semiotic sign systems subject to intellectual property laws are not themselves forms of real property, as they do not meet the categorical requirements of scarce resources.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Mass communication. $3 2144804
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
650 4 $a Patent law. $3 3168356
690 $a 0708
690 $a 0513
690 $a 0562
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Journalism and Mass Communication. $3 3341356
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 80-04A(E).
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10974525