東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Clinical Teaching in the Intensive C...

Al-Saadi, Mukhtar.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Clinical Teaching in the Intensive Care Unit: Evaluation of the Perception of Trainees and Physicians.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Clinical Teaching in the Intensive Care Unit: Evaluation of the Perception of Trainees and Physicians./
作者:	Al-Saadi, Mukhtar.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	117 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International80-07A(E).
標題:	Curriculum development. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13836645
ISBN:	9780438839731

Clinical Teaching in the Intensive Care Unit: Evaluation of the Perception of Trainees and Physicians.
Al-Saadi, Mukhtar.

Clinical Teaching in the Intensive Care Unit: Evaluation of the Perception of Trainees and Physicians. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 117 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Houston, 2018.

Background: The education of trainees in the intensive care unit (ICU) is extremely challenging due to factors related to the ICU environment, ICU trainees and physicians, ICU subspecialty training, and safety and quality of care delivered to critically ill patients. There is a lack of standardized educational curricula and instructional methods for teaching in the ICU. The teaching practices, the learning climate, the instructional methods, and obstacles to learning and teaching in the ICU have not been evaluated. Purpose: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the teaching practices, the learning climate, the ICU environment, the preferred instructional methods, and obstacles to learning and teaching in the ICU from the perspectives of learners (trainees) and teachers (physicians). Methods: A survey was conducted using the Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire and supplementary questions in a medical school in South Texas. Data were collected from ICU learners and teachers and were analyzed using ANOVA and multiple comparison procedures. Results: Learners rated the teaching practices and learning climate in the ICU significantly lower than teachers in all categories of the Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire. Learners and teachers recognized the ICU environment as ideal to learn and teach complex clinical cases and to enhance procedural skills. Most teachers indicated bedside teaching and case-based learning as the preferred instructional methods while learners indicated a combination of methods as the preferred instructional strategy in the ICU. The main obstacle for learners was unclear expectations and objectives of the ICU rotation. The main obstacle for teachers was not enough time for teaching. Conclusion: A disparity of perceptions existed between ICU trainees and physicians regarding the teaching practices and learning climate in the ICU. The preferred instructional methods for trainees are to use different instructional strategies. The ICU environment has many challenges for learners and teachers.

ISBN: 9780438839731Subjects--Topical Terms:

684418
Curriculum development.

Clinical Teaching in the Intensive Care Unit: Evaluation of the Perception of Trainees and Physicians.
LDR:03065nmm a2200313 4500 001 2204507
005 20190716100708.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438839731
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13836645
035 $a (MiAaPQ)0087vireo:3996Al-Saadi
035 $a AAI13836645
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Al-Saadi, Mukhtar. $3 3431377
245 1 0 $a Clinical Teaching in the Intensive Care Unit: Evaluation of the Perception of Trainees and Physicians.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 117 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Bernard Robin.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Houston, 2018.
520 $a Background: The education of trainees in the intensive care unit (ICU) is extremely challenging due to factors related to the ICU environment, ICU trainees and physicians, ICU subspecialty training, and safety and quality of care delivered to critically ill patients. There is a lack of standardized educational curricula and instructional methods for teaching in the ICU. The teaching practices, the learning climate, the instructional methods, and obstacles to learning and teaching in the ICU have not been evaluated. Purpose: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the teaching practices, the learning climate, the ICU environment, the preferred instructional methods, and obstacles to learning and teaching in the ICU from the perspectives of learners (trainees) and teachers (physicians). Methods: A survey was conducted using the Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire and supplementary questions in a medical school in South Texas. Data were collected from ICU learners and teachers and were analyzed using ANOVA and multiple comparison procedures. Results: Learners rated the teaching practices and learning climate in the ICU significantly lower than teachers in all categories of the Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire. Learners and teachers recognized the ICU environment as ideal to learn and teach complex clinical cases and to enhance procedural skills. Most teachers indicated bedside teaching and case-based learning as the preferred instructional methods while learners indicated a combination of methods as the preferred instructional strategy in the ICU. The main obstacle for learners was unclear expectations and objectives of the ICU rotation. The main obstacle for teachers was not enough time for teaching. Conclusion: A disparity of perceptions existed between ICU trainees and physicians regarding the teaching practices and learning climate in the ICU. The preferred instructional methods for trainees are to use different instructional strategies. The ICU environment has many challenges for learners and teachers.
590 $a School code: 0087.
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Adult education. $3 543202
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0516
710 2 $a University of Houston. $b Curriculum and Instruction. $3 3431378
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 80-07A(E).
790 $a 0087
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13836645