東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Voice Professionals' Preferred Diagn...

Miller, Kasey Lynn.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Voice Professionals' Preferred Diagnostic Methodology and the Varying Effect of Experience on Their Choices.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Voice Professionals' Preferred Diagnostic Methodology and the Varying Effect of Experience on Their Choices./
作者:	Miller, Kasey Lynn.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	81 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 58-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International58-01(E).
標題:	Speech therapy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10842878
ISBN:	9780438207790

Voice Professionals' Preferred Diagnostic Methodology and the Varying Effect of Experience on Their Choices.
Miller, Kasey Lynn.

Voice Professionals' Preferred Diagnostic Methodology and the Varying Effect of Experience on Their Choices. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 81 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 58-01.

Thesis (M.S.L.P.)--Misericordia University, 2018.

The purpose of this study was to determine what diagnostic methods voice professionals use when completing a voice evaluation and whether or not level of experience affected their chosen methodology. Forty-nine speech-language pathologists, who work in the field of voice disorders, participated in a web-based survey providing information regarding their experience in the field (years and hours per week), in addition to their preferred diagnostic methodology in the areas of visual perceptual, auditory perceptual, patient perceptual, as well as acoustical, and aerodynamic measures. The results of the study showed that professionals use a wide variety of measures when completing diagnostic voice evaluations. A limited agreement was observed with type of measures within each subcategory as well as with the inclusion of measures across each subcategory. Results also indicated that experience (both years and hours per week) had a varying relationship with the participants' chosen diagnostic procedures. Overall, the following trends were observed: (1) participants with more experience in the field (both years and hours per week) were more likely to report the use of costly measures/procedures (i.e., acoustical and aerodynamic hardware/software, and video stroboscopy), and (2) participants with greater years of experience were more likely to use self-created and/or self-modified auditory perceptual and aerodynamic measures. The varying relationship between experience and the participants' preferred methodology may suggest that there are other internal factors, besides experience, affecting their reasons for choosing their preferred diagnostic methodology.

ISBN: 9780438207790Subjects--Topical Terms:

520446
Speech therapy.

Voice Professionals' Preferred Diagnostic Methodology and the Varying Effect of Experience on Their Choices.
LDR:02623nmm a2200289 4500 001 2204371
005 20190708093342.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438207790
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10842878
035 $a (MiAaPQ)misericordia:10006
035 $a AAI10842878
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Miller, Kasey Lynn. $3 3431220
245 1 0 $a Voice Professionals' Preferred Diagnostic Methodology and the Varying Effect of Experience on Their Choices.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 81 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 58-01.
500 $a Adviser: Jessica Kisenwether.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.L.P.)--Misericordia University, 2018.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to determine what diagnostic methods voice professionals use when completing a voice evaluation and whether or not level of experience affected their chosen methodology. Forty-nine speech-language pathologists, who work in the field of voice disorders, participated in a web-based survey providing information regarding their experience in the field (years and hours per week), in addition to their preferred diagnostic methodology in the areas of visual perceptual, auditory perceptual, patient perceptual, as well as acoustical, and aerodynamic measures. The results of the study showed that professionals use a wide variety of measures when completing diagnostic voice evaluations. A limited agreement was observed with type of measures within each subcategory as well as with the inclusion of measures across each subcategory. Results also indicated that experience (both years and hours per week) had a varying relationship with the participants' chosen diagnostic procedures. Overall, the following trends were observed: (1) participants with more experience in the field (both years and hours per week) were more likely to report the use of costly measures/procedures (i.e., acoustical and aerodynamic hardware/software, and video stroboscopy), and (2) participants with greater years of experience were more likely to use self-created and/or self-modified auditory perceptual and aerodynamic measures. The varying relationship between experience and the participants' preferred methodology may suggest that there are other internal factors, besides experience, affecting their reasons for choosing their preferred diagnostic methodology.
590 $a School code: 1570.
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
690 $a 0460
710 2 $a Misericordia University. $b Speech Language Pathology. $3 3431221
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 58-01(E).
790 $a 1570
791 $a M.S.L.P.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10842878