東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Clinical Preferences and Practices o...

DiTota, Jillian.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Clinical Preferences and Practices of Speech-Language Pathologists for Clinical/Bedside Swallowing Evaluations: A Replication Study.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Clinical Preferences and Practices of Speech-Language Pathologists for Clinical/Bedside Swallowing Evaluations: A Replication Study./
作者:	DiTota, Jillian.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	59 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-06(E).
標題:	Speech therapy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10807745
ISBN:	9780438107250

Clinical Preferences and Practices of Speech-Language Pathologists for Clinical/Bedside Swallowing Evaluations: A Replication Study.
DiTota, Jillian.

Clinical Preferences and Practices of Speech-Language Pathologists for Clinical/Bedside Swallowing Evaluations: A Replication Study. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 59 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06.

Thesis (M.S.)--Southern Connecticut State University, 2018.

A replication of McCullough et al. (1999) study to re-examine clinicians' preferences and practice of measures used during clinical/bedside evaluations of swallowing was completed. The purposes of this study were to (1) to understand which clinical/bedside evaluations measures/methods clinicians currently use; (2) to determine if those methods are supported by evidence in the literature; and (3) to compare the current findings to those of the McCullough et al. (1999) study. Sixty-one surveys were accepted and analyzed. McCullough et al. (1999) reported that 56% of measures that clinicians preferred and used, did not have research to support their use. This study found that only 12% of the current preferred and practiced measures (7/57) were not supported in the literature. Only 11 measures in total did not currently have research available in the literature. The change can be explained by more researched published since the original study, and differing clinical opinions between the original McCullough et al. (1999) study and current studies. Results also showed that statistically significant change between this study and the original, was apparent in all areas of preferences and practices, except for preferences of trial swallow measures. Further research into how clinicians are practicing these measures is warranted. More research is still needed to either justify or negate the use of unstudied clinical/bedside measures.

ISBN: 9780438107250Subjects--Topical Terms:

520446
Speech therapy.

Clinical Preferences and Practices of Speech-Language Pathologists for Clinical/Bedside Swallowing Evaluations: A Replication Study.
LDR:02417nmm a2200289 4500 001 2204368
005 20190708093342.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438107250
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10807745
035 $a (MiAaPQ)southernct:10334
035 $a AAI10807745
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a DiTota, Jillian. $3 3431217
245 1 0 $a Clinical Preferences and Practices of Speech-Language Pathologists for Clinical/Bedside Swallowing Evaluations: A Replication Study.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 59 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06.
500 $a Adviser: Heather Warner.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Southern Connecticut State University, 2018.
520 $a A replication of McCullough et al. (1999) study to re-examine clinicians' preferences and practice of measures used during clinical/bedside evaluations of swallowing was completed. The purposes of this study were to (1) to understand which clinical/bedside evaluations measures/methods clinicians currently use; (2) to determine if those methods are supported by evidence in the literature; and (3) to compare the current findings to those of the McCullough et al. (1999) study. Sixty-one surveys were accepted and analyzed. McCullough et al. (1999) reported that 56% of measures that clinicians preferred and used, did not have research to support their use. This study found that only 12% of the current preferred and practiced measures (7/57) were not supported in the literature. Only 11 measures in total did not currently have research available in the literature. The change can be explained by more researched published since the original study, and differing clinical opinions between the original McCullough et al. (1999) study and current studies. Results also showed that statistically significant change between this study and the original, was apparent in all areas of preferences and practices, except for preferences of trial swallow measures. Further research into how clinicians are practicing these measures is warranted. More research is still needed to either justify or negate the use of unstudied clinical/bedside measures.
590 $a School code: 0928.
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
690 $a 0460
710 2 $a Southern Connecticut State University. $b Communication Disorders. $3 3351163
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-06(E).
790 $a 0928
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10807745