東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

"We're Not Going to Talk about That:...

Powell, Rebecca L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

"We're Not Going to Talk about That:" A Qualitative Case Study of Three Elementary Teachers' Experiences Integrating Literacy and Social Studies.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	"We're Not Going to Talk about That:" A Qualitative Case Study of Three Elementary Teachers' Experiences Integrating Literacy and Social Studies./
作者:	Powell, Rebecca L.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	268 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-10A(E).
標題:	Curriculum development. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10787836
ISBN:	9780355982831

"We're Not Going to Talk about That:" A Qualitative Case Study of Three Elementary Teachers' Experiences Integrating Literacy and Social Studies.
Powell, Rebecca L.

"We're Not Going to Talk about That:" A Qualitative Case Study of Three Elementary Teachers' Experiences Integrating Literacy and Social Studies. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 268 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2018.

The purpose of this interpretive, qualitative multi-case study (Merriam, 2001; Stake, 1995) was to describe the experiences of three elementary classroom teachers as they integrated literacy and social studies during their literacy instruction. This study was grounded in an interpretivist paradigm and a theoretical lens of symbolic interactionism. The guiding questions were: What are the experiences of three elementary teachers when integrating literacy and social studies instruction? What information do teachers use when making decisions about integrated instruction? How do teachers' beliefs align with their practices? How do teachers organize, plan for, and provide integrated instruction, including how they use the core English/Language Arts programs and core social studies programs? In what ways, if any, do teachers use disciplinary literacy strategies to support social studies instruction? I collected data from teachers in kindergarten, third grade, and fifth grade classrooms in a K-8 Title One school. Data included audio-recorded one-on-one semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, lesson plans, photographs, and my researcher journal. I began data analysis through inductive coding of each interview and observation, and then coded each through deductive analysis using Cunningham and Allington's (2011) pillars of effective literacy instruction. I deductively coded the data using the six proven practices for effective civic learning based on the National Center for Learning and Civic Engagement (NCLCE, Guilfoile & Delander, 2014). Data analysis then moved to the crosswalk I created using the pillars of effective literacy instruction and the NCLCE proven practices. Data analysis concluded with the cross-case analysis. During the data analysis, member checks and three meetings with a peer reviewer occurred. Findings from this study indicate teachers continue to experience conflict between their beliefs and practices, often due to state, district, and school mandates. Additionally, the study findings indicate a desire for focused professional development, both face-to-face and through digital tools, on how to effectively integrate literacy and social studies. Moreover, professional development is needed to support teachers in their use of critical literacy. Findings also indicate that the teachers in this study experienced censorship, imposed by others and themselves. The study concluded with my interpretation of the findings based on the reviewed literature, suggestions for future research, and a crosswalk for professional development to support teachers in planning for effective integrated literacy and social studies instruction.

ISBN: 9780355982831Subjects--Topical Terms:

684418
Curriculum development.

"We're Not Going to Talk about That:" A Qualitative Case Study of Three Elementary Teachers' Experiences Integrating Literacy and Social Studies.
LDR:03906nmm a2200349 4500 001 2204304
005 20190709084846.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355982831
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10787836
035 $a (MiAaPQ)usf:14732
035 $a AAI10787836
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Powell, Rebecca L. $3 3431145
245 1 0 $a "We're Not Going to Talk about That:" A Qualitative Case Study of Three Elementary Teachers' Experiences Integrating Literacy and Social Studies.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 268 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Danielle Dennis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Florida, 2018.
520 $a The purpose of this interpretive, qualitative multi-case study (Merriam, 2001; Stake, 1995) was to describe the experiences of three elementary classroom teachers as they integrated literacy and social studies during their literacy instruction. This study was grounded in an interpretivist paradigm and a theoretical lens of symbolic interactionism. The guiding questions were: What are the experiences of three elementary teachers when integrating literacy and social studies instruction? What information do teachers use when making decisions about integrated instruction? How do teachers' beliefs align with their practices? How do teachers organize, plan for, and provide integrated instruction, including how they use the core English/Language Arts programs and core social studies programs? In what ways, if any, do teachers use disciplinary literacy strategies to support social studies instruction? I collected data from teachers in kindergarten, third grade, and fifth grade classrooms in a K-8 Title One school. Data included audio-recorded one-on-one semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, lesson plans, photographs, and my researcher journal. I began data analysis through inductive coding of each interview and observation, and then coded each through deductive analysis using Cunningham and Allington's (2011) pillars of effective literacy instruction. I deductively coded the data using the six proven practices for effective civic learning based on the National Center for Learning and Civic Engagement (NCLCE, Guilfoile & Delander, 2014). Data analysis then moved to the crosswalk I created using the pillars of effective literacy instruction and the NCLCE proven practices. Data analysis concluded with the cross-case analysis. During the data analysis, member checks and three meetings with a peer reviewer occurred. Findings from this study indicate teachers continue to experience conflict between their beliefs and practices, often due to state, district, and school mandates. Additionally, the study findings indicate a desire for focused professional development, both face-to-face and through digital tools, on how to effectively integrate literacy and social studies. Moreover, professional development is needed to support teachers in their use of critical literacy. Findings also indicate that the teachers in this study experienced censorship, imposed by others and themselves. The study concluded with my interpretation of the findings based on the reviewed literature, suggestions for future research, and a crosswalk for professional development to support teachers in planning for effective integrated literacy and social studies instruction.
520 $a Keywords: elementary social studies, censorship, integrated curriculum, professional development, effective instruction.
590 $a School code: 0206.
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
650 4 $a Social sciences education. $3 2144735
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0534
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0524
710 2 $a University of South Florida. $b Curriculum and Instruction. $3 3168850
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-10A(E).
790 $a 0206
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10787836