東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Implementation of the Open Choic...

Longobucco, Kimberly.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Implementation of the Open Choice Legislation in the State of Connecticut.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Implementation of the Open Choice Legislation in the State of Connecticut./
作者:	Longobucco, Kimberly.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	136 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
標題:	Educational leadership. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10786577
ISBN:	9780355914795

The Implementation of the Open Choice Legislation in the State of Connecticut.
Longobucco, Kimberly.

The Implementation of the Open Choice Legislation in the State of Connecticut. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 136 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Southern Connecticut State University, 2018.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the similarities and differences that exist between the delivery and implementation of the Open Choice legislation between four governing Regional Educational Service Centers. The study focused on the number of students serviced through each organization, as well as the number of receiving districts that participate. This study aimed to provide insight into the variation of students participating in the Open Choice program throughout the State of Connecticut, as well as determine if it is an equitable educational opportunity for all students.

ISBN: 9780355914795Subjects--Topical Terms:

529436
Educational leadership.

The Implementation of the Open Choice Legislation in the State of Connecticut.
LDR:04040nmm a2200337 4500 001 2203723
005 20190606091702.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355914795
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10786577
035 $a (MiAaPQ)southernct:10314
035 $a AAI10786577
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Longobucco, Kimberly. $3 3430529
245 1 4 $a The Implementation of the Open Choice Legislation in the State of Connecticut.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 136 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Sousan Arafeh.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Southern Connecticut State University, 2018.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to investigate the similarities and differences that exist between the delivery and implementation of the Open Choice legislation between four governing Regional Educational Service Centers. The study focused on the number of students serviced through each organization, as well as the number of receiving districts that participate. This study aimed to provide insight into the variation of students participating in the Open Choice program throughout the State of Connecticut, as well as determine if it is an equitable educational opportunity for all students.
520 $a The study included three personal interviews at RESC's in Connecticut (CREC, LEARN, CES), followed by personal interviews at six public school districts, three that accept Open Choice students and three that do not. Finally an electronic survey was sent to all districts that are governed by the four RESC's that participate in the Open Choice program. All interviews were audio recorded and answers were transcribed and coded using a thematic approach. The process identified themes and patterns within and between interviews in an attempt to answer the research questions below: 1. How is the Open Choice legislation in the State of Connecticut implemented? • Why are there more accepting school districts in some regions? • What are reasons for districts not agreeing to participate? • What are the similarities and differences between the implementation of the Open Choice legislation between the four Regional Educational Service Centers in the State of Connecticut? 2. Why do districts participate in the Open Choice program? • Why does the enrollment of Open Choice students vary throughout the State of Connecticut? • What is the rationale for only four major urban cities participating in the Open Choice program in the State of Connecticut? 3. Are there equity implications of the Open Choice legislation in the State of Connecticut?
520 $a Differences exist between the implementation of the Open Choice legislation in the State of Connecticut. Differences exist in the population that is serviced as well as the availability of the program. The research in this study was able to uncover some of the inconsistencies between RESCs as well as many feelings from districts that participate in the program and those that do not. Differences in funding, transportation and personal at each RESC as well as after school and summer opportunities exist between all three RESCs that participated. After the completion of district interviews similarities did exist but differences were more prevalent. Students have different opportunities based on where they live in the state, which is exactly what the Sheff mandate was attempting to eliminate. Similarities did exist between districts that participate in the program with regards to reasons why they choose to participate. All districts felt that there is value to the program for both Open Choice students as well as students in the receiving district.
590 $a School code: 0928.
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a Southern Connecticut State University. $b Educational Leadership. $3 3191147
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09A(E).
790 $a 0928
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10786577