東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

U.S. Corporate Energy Productivity, ...

Tate, Terry.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

U.S. Corporate Energy Productivity, Greenhouse Gas Productivity, and Return on Equity.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	U.S. Corporate Energy Productivity, Greenhouse Gas Productivity, and Return on Equity./
作者:	Tate, Terry.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	121 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International80-01A(E).
標題:	Business administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10930791
ISBN:	9780438294264

U.S. Corporate Energy Productivity, Greenhouse Gas Productivity, and Return on Equity.
Tate, Terry.

U.S. Corporate Energy Productivity, Greenhouse Gas Productivity, and Return on Equity. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 121 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (D.B.A.)--Walden University, 2018.

Corporate leaders are expected to engage in corporate social responsibility by some stakeholders, but there is no consistent evidence that corporate social performance relates to financial performance. Grounded in instrumental stakeholder theory, the purpose of this correlational study was to examine the relationship among energy productivity, greenhouse gas productivity, and return on equity. The 2016 Newsweek Green Ranking U.S. 500 was the population for this study, which consisted of the largest companies in the United States with the highest corporate social performance scores. The secondary data were collected from Newsweek.com and Morningstar.com for this study. The multiple linear regression was used in the data analysis for the study. This study's model was F(2,104) = 1.028, p = .361, Adjusted R2 = .001 and represented that there was not a statistically significant relationship among energy productivity, greenhouse gas productivity, and return on equity. The implications for positive social change include the potential to provide corporate leaders with additional evidence to inform fact-based decisions related to the strategic allocation of resources to manage corporate energy productivity and greenhouse productivity. Effectively managing energy productivity and greenhouse gas productivity could contribute to reducing global warming, which would improve the quality of lives of U.S residents.

ISBN: 9780438294264Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168311
Business administration.

U.S. Corporate Energy Productivity, Greenhouse Gas Productivity, and Return on Equity.
LDR:02396nmm a2200313 4500 001 2203628
005 20190531105741.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438294264
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10930791
035 $a (MiAaPQ)waldenu:21172
035 $a AAI10930791
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Tate, Terry. $3 3430432
245 1 0 $a U.S. Corporate Energy Productivity, Greenhouse Gas Productivity, and Return on Equity.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 121 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Craig Martin.
502 $a Thesis (D.B.A.)--Walden University, 2018.
520 $a Corporate leaders are expected to engage in corporate social responsibility by some stakeholders, but there is no consistent evidence that corporate social performance relates to financial performance. Grounded in instrumental stakeholder theory, the purpose of this correlational study was to examine the relationship among energy productivity, greenhouse gas productivity, and return on equity. The 2016 Newsweek Green Ranking U.S. 500 was the population for this study, which consisted of the largest companies in the United States with the highest corporate social performance scores. The secondary data were collected from Newsweek.com and Morningstar.com for this study. The multiple linear regression was used in the data analysis for the study. This study's model was F(2,104) = 1.028, p = .361, Adjusted R2 = .001 and represented that there was not a statistically significant relationship among energy productivity, greenhouse gas productivity, and return on equity. The implications for positive social change include the potential to provide corporate leaders with additional evidence to inform fact-based decisions related to the strategic allocation of resources to manage corporate energy productivity and greenhouse productivity. Effectively managing energy productivity and greenhouse gas productivity could contribute to reducing global warming, which would improve the quality of lives of U.S residents.
590 $a School code: 0543.
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 3168311
650 4 $a Finance. $3 542899
650 4 $a Environmental economics. $3 535179
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0438
710 2 $a Walden University. $b Management. $3 3168394
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 80-01A(E).
790 $a 0543
791 $a D.B.A.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10930791