東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Inferring Human Intent in Novice Hum...

Warrier, Rahul B.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Inferring Human Intent in Novice Human-in-the-Loop Control Tasks.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Inferring Human Intent in Novice Human-in-the-Loop Control Tasks./
Author:	Warrier, Rahul B.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
Description:	253 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International80-03B(E).
Subject:	Mechanical engineering. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10932565
ISBN:	9780438524842

Inferring Human Intent in Novice Human-in-the-Loop Control Tasks.
Warrier, Rahul B.

Inferring Human Intent in Novice Human-in-the-Loop Control Tasks. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 253 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2018.

Inferring intentions is fundamental to successful interaction among two or more agents. For example, in learning from a teacher the student must be able to first understand the teacher's intent from the displayed demonstrations which is then committed to memory by imitation and self-practice. Analogously, robots may also be taught new skills using this Teaching by Demonstration (TbD) paradigm, in which case inferring the human teacher's intent becomes necessary, especially when precision in learning new skills is important, such as in precision assembly tasks or surgery. The primary challenge in learning from a human-in-the-loop operator is that the actions do not always match the intended goal. This stems from the inherent dynamics of human response, which affects the overall closed loop tracking performance when the human is placed in the control loop. This work proposes an inversion approach to compensate for the human-in-the-loop dynamics to infer the underlying intent of the human-in-the-loop operator's actions. As a result, the task representation using this inferred intent is potentially improved over that based on imperfect human demonstrations.

ISBN: 9780438524842Subjects--Topical Terms:

649730
Mechanical engineering.

Inferring Human Intent in Novice Human-in-the-Loop Control Tasks.
LDR:02645nmm a2200325 4500 001 2203242
005 20190528072654.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438524842
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10932565
035 $a (MiAaPQ)washington:19295
035 $a AAI10932565
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Warrier, Rahul B. $3 3430035
245 1 0 $a Inferring Human Intent in Novice Human-in-the-Loop Control Tasks.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 253 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Santosh Devasia.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2018.
520 $a Inferring intentions is fundamental to successful interaction among two or more agents. For example, in learning from a teacher the student must be able to first understand the teacher's intent from the displayed demonstrations which is then committed to memory by imitation and self-practice. Analogously, robots may also be taught new skills using this Teaching by Demonstration (TbD) paradigm, in which case inferring the human teacher's intent becomes necessary, especially when precision in learning new skills is important, such as in precision assembly tasks or surgery. The primary challenge in learning from a human-in-the-loop operator is that the actions do not always match the intended goal. This stems from the inherent dynamics of human response, which affects the overall closed loop tracking performance when the human is placed in the control loop. This work proposes an inversion approach to compensate for the human-in-the-loop dynamics to infer the underlying intent of the human-in-the-loop operator's actions. As a result, the task representation using this inferred intent is potentially improved over that based on imperfect human demonstrations.
520 $a The following are the main contributions of this work: (1) Stable inversion of human dynamics models to iteratively infer human-in-the-loop intent, with convergence guarantees robust to modeling uncertainty and output noise, (2) One-shot human intent prediction with guarantees on improved tracking accuracy compared to demonstrations, (3) Experimental validation of iterative and one-shot human-intent prediction and its application to human-guided robot learning with multiple human subjects.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Mechanical engineering. $3 649730
650 4 $a Robotics. $3 519753
650 4 $a Systems science. $3 3168411
690 $a 0548
690 $a 0771
690 $a 0790
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Mechanical Engineering. $3 2092993
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 80-03B(E).
790 $a 0250
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10932565