東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Do Planning and Design Policies and ...

Heris, Mehdi Pourpeikari.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Do Planning and Design Policies and Procedures Matter In Microclimate Management and Urban Heat Mitigation?

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Do Planning and Design Policies and Procedures Matter In Microclimate Management and Urban Heat Mitigation?/
作者:	Heris, Mehdi Pourpeikari.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	231 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-10A(E).
標題:	Urban planning. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10811549
ISBN:	9780438031630

Do Planning and Design Policies and Procedures Matter In Microclimate Management and Urban Heat Mitigation?
Heris, Mehdi Pourpeikari.

Do Planning and Design Policies and Procedures Matter In Microclimate Management and Urban Heat Mitigation? - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 231 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Denver, 2018.

In this research, I developed a method for analyzing how urban form affects urban microclimate and how planning and design policies shape urban form. I scrutinized the policies, contexts, and implementation procedures of urban redevelopment projects in two cities in the Denver metropolitan area. Both the Belmar (located in Lakewood, Colorado) and 29th Street Mall (located in Boulder, Colorado) projects were conventional indoor malls developed in the 1960s, that declined in the 1990s, and were redeveloped in the early 2000s to create mixed-use walkable urban centers. The zoning approaches (Belmar used Form-based code, 29th Street Mall used Euclidian), design guidelines, and local politics of these two projects were significantly different in ways that resulted in different built environments after redevelopment. My research aim is to explore how these differences can potentially impact urban climate systems with positive or negative influences on climate variables such as wind, ambient temperature and mean radiant temperature. My research answers two research questions: (1) to what extent are different zoning approaches (Euclidian and Form-based) capable of mitigating urban heat? (2) To what extent are planning contexts, including local politics, important in developing a climate responsive project? I found that a series of variables affected the process of planning and design in these sites. The findings show that the choices made in the development management affected the microclimate of both sites. The built form of Belmar is more effective in heat mitigation and creating a more comfortable temperature. Based on the results of both my microclimate simulations and the policy analysis, I identified five main themes in the development management of both sites that control microclimate outcomes and show why Belmar ultimately was a better project. These themes, which are also relevant for other environmental objectives, are: (1) urban vision, (2) land use and building form controls, (3) design guidelines, (4) public financing, and (5) condemnation/ownership factors. These five policy themes I have identified explain how a combination of context and choice variations affect the quality of built environments. Although many regulations did not intentionally address microclimate issues, elements that were considered for improving walkability contributed to heat mitigation as well. The simulation of policy and form variations showed that the built environment of Belmar has been more successful in mitigating urban heat. Conflicts and a complex planning history in Boulder led to a very slow and ineffective review process that created a less climate responsive built environment.

ISBN: 9780438031630Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122922
Urban planning.

Do Planning and Design Policies and Procedures Matter In Microclimate Management and Urban Heat Mitigation?
LDR:03741nmm a2200313 4500 001 2203030
005 20190528122951.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438031630
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10811549
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ucdenver:11086
035 $a AAI10811549
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Heris, Mehdi Pourpeikari. $3 3429810
245 1 0 $a Do Planning and Design Policies and Procedures Matter In Microclimate Management and Urban Heat Mitigation?
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 231 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Brian H. Muller; Austin Troy.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Denver, 2018.
520 $a In this research, I developed a method for analyzing how urban form affects urban microclimate and how planning and design policies shape urban form. I scrutinized the policies, contexts, and implementation procedures of urban redevelopment projects in two cities in the Denver metropolitan area. Both the Belmar (located in Lakewood, Colorado) and 29th Street Mall (located in Boulder, Colorado) projects were conventional indoor malls developed in the 1960s, that declined in the 1990s, and were redeveloped in the early 2000s to create mixed-use walkable urban centers. The zoning approaches (Belmar used Form-based code, 29th Street Mall used Euclidian), design guidelines, and local politics of these two projects were significantly different in ways that resulted in different built environments after redevelopment. My research aim is to explore how these differences can potentially impact urban climate systems with positive or negative influences on climate variables such as wind, ambient temperature and mean radiant temperature. My research answers two research questions: (1) to what extent are different zoning approaches (Euclidian and Form-based) capable of mitigating urban heat? (2) To what extent are planning contexts, including local politics, important in developing a climate responsive project? I found that a series of variables affected the process of planning and design in these sites. The findings show that the choices made in the development management affected the microclimate of both sites. The built form of Belmar is more effective in heat mitigation and creating a more comfortable temperature. Based on the results of both my microclimate simulations and the policy analysis, I identified five main themes in the development management of both sites that control microclimate outcomes and show why Belmar ultimately was a better project. These themes, which are also relevant for other environmental objectives, are: (1) urban vision, (2) land use and building form controls, (3) design guidelines, (4) public financing, and (5) condemnation/ownership factors. These five policy themes I have identified explain how a combination of context and choice variations affect the quality of built environments. Although many regulations did not intentionally address microclimate issues, elements that were considered for improving walkability contributed to heat mitigation as well. The simulation of policy and form variations showed that the built environment of Belmar has been more successful in mitigating urban heat. Conflicts and a complex planning history in Boulder led to a very slow and ineffective review process that created a less climate responsive built environment.
590 $a School code: 0765.
650 4 $a Urban planning. $3 2122922
650 4 $a Geographic information science and geodesy. $3 2122917
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
690 $a 0999
690 $a 0370
690 $a 0404
710 2 $a University of Colorado at Denver. $b Urban and Regional Planning. $3 3186849
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-10A(E).
790 $a 0765
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10811549