東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An Examination of Reported Motivatio...

Cooper, Pete.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Examination of Reported Motivation and Time Allocation across Five Teaching Tasks amongst Online and Onsite University Level Social Science Faculty = = AN EXAMINATION OF REPORTED MOTIVATION AND TIME ALLOCATION ACROSS FIVE TEACHING TASKS AMONGST ONLINE AND ONSITE UNIVERSITY LEVEL SOCIAL SCIENCE FACULTY.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	An Examination of Reported Motivation and Time Allocation across Five Teaching Tasks amongst Online and Onsite University Level Social Science Faculty =/
Reminder of title:	AN EXAMINATION OF REPORTED MOTIVATION AND TIME ALLOCATION ACROSS FIVE TEACHING TASKS AMONGST ONLINE AND ONSITE UNIVERSITY LEVEL SOCIAL SCIENCE FACULTY.
Author:	Cooper, Pete.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
Description:	149 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International80-03B(E).
Subject:	Counseling Psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10842215
ISBN:	9780438621091

An Examination of Reported Motivation and Time Allocation across Five Teaching Tasks amongst Online and Onsite University Level Social Science Faculty = = AN EXAMINATION OF REPORTED MOTIVATION AND TIME ALLOCATION ACROSS FIVE TEACHING TASKS AMONGST ONLINE AND ONSITE UNIVERSITY LEVEL SOCIAL SCIENCE FACULTY.
Cooper, Pete.

An Examination of Reported Motivation and Time Allocation across Five Teaching Tasks amongst Online and Onsite University Level Social Science Faculty =AN EXAMINATION OF REPORTED MOTIVATION AND TIME ALLOCATION ACROSS FIVE TEACHING TASKS AMONGST ONLINE AND ONSITE UNIVERSITY LEVEL SOCIAL SCIENCE FACULTY. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 149 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2018.

The objective of this examination was to determine if there were significant differences in reported levels of motivation across five teaching tasks, as well as time allocated to each teaching task, among online and onsite university-level social science faculty. One hundred thirty-six social science faculty members were allocated into two groups that reported teaching in either online or onsite settings. Each participant completed the WTMST measuring various types of motivation across various types of teaching tasks. A measure of estimated time spent on each of the five teaching tasks was also obtained. The two groups showed several similarities in amount of motivation across teaching tasks and types of motivation with greater motivation for teaching, class preparation and evaluation of students than administrative and complementary tasks and greater motivation for teaching than class preparation. Both groups showed greater identified regulation than intrinsic motivation and greater intrinsic motivation and identified and external regulation than introjected regulation and amotivation. However, the onsite group reported greater motivation for teaching and class preparation than evaluation of students that was not shown for the online group and the onsite group reporting greater external regulation than intrinsic motivation and greater introjected regulation than amotivation that was not shown for the online group. The onsite group reported more time teaching than evaluation of students while the opposite finding was shown for the online group. The onsite group reported more time on class preparation than the other tasks except teaching while the online group reported less time, or no difference in time, spent on class preparation compared to other tasks. Reported time estimates and motivation scores were shown to be positively correlated across teaching tasks. The patterns of motivation scores across teaching tasks and types of motivation are described relative to self-determination theory. Differences within groups in motivation scores, and reported allocation of time, across teaching tasks, and corresponding positive correlation between motivation scores and reported time estimates suggests a relationship between the distribution of required duties of faculty and their motivational experiences. The findings are discussed relative to potential future qualitative and quantitative research of college faculty motivation and time allocated to various tasks, and relative to benefits to college level faculty, administrators and faculty services, and to students, toward facilitating quality of the academic experience.

ISBN: 9780438621091Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122842
Counseling Psychology.

An Examination of Reported Motivation and Time Allocation across Five Teaching Tasks amongst Online and Onsite University Level Social Science Faculty = = AN EXAMINATION OF REPORTED MOTIVATION AND TIME ALLOCATION ACROSS FIVE TEACHING TASKS AMONGST ONLINE AND ONSITE UNIVERSITY LEVEL SOCIAL SCIENCE FACULTY.
LDR:03899nmm a2200337 4500 001 2202755
005 20190513114840.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438621091
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10842215
035 $a (MiAaPQ)capella:20361
035 $a AAI10842215
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Cooper, Pete. $3 3429525
245 1 3 $a An Examination of Reported Motivation and Time Allocation across Five Teaching Tasks amongst Online and Onsite University Level Social Science Faculty = $b AN EXAMINATION OF REPORTED MOTIVATION AND TIME ALLOCATION ACROSS FIVE TEACHING TASKS AMONGST ONLINE AND ONSITE UNIVERSITY LEVEL SOCIAL SCIENCE FACULTY.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 149 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Chris Kladopoulos.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2018.
520 $a The objective of this examination was to determine if there were significant differences in reported levels of motivation across five teaching tasks, as well as time allocated to each teaching task, among online and onsite university-level social science faculty. One hundred thirty-six social science faculty members were allocated into two groups that reported teaching in either online or onsite settings. Each participant completed the WTMST measuring various types of motivation across various types of teaching tasks. A measure of estimated time spent on each of the five teaching tasks was also obtained. The two groups showed several similarities in amount of motivation across teaching tasks and types of motivation with greater motivation for teaching, class preparation and evaluation of students than administrative and complementary tasks and greater motivation for teaching than class preparation. Both groups showed greater identified regulation than intrinsic motivation and greater intrinsic motivation and identified and external regulation than introjected regulation and amotivation. However, the onsite group reported greater motivation for teaching and class preparation than evaluation of students that was not shown for the online group and the onsite group reporting greater external regulation than intrinsic motivation and greater introjected regulation than amotivation that was not shown for the online group. The onsite group reported more time teaching than evaluation of students while the opposite finding was shown for the online group. The onsite group reported more time on class preparation than the other tasks except teaching while the online group reported less time, or no difference in time, spent on class preparation compared to other tasks. Reported time estimates and motivation scores were shown to be positively correlated across teaching tasks. The patterns of motivation scores across teaching tasks and types of motivation are described relative to self-determination theory. Differences within groups in motivation scores, and reported allocation of time, across teaching tasks, and corresponding positive correlation between motivation scores and reported time estimates suggests a relationship between the distribution of required duties of faculty and their motivational experiences. The findings are discussed relative to potential future qualitative and quantitative research of college faculty motivation and time allocated to various tasks, and relative to benefits to college level faculty, administrators and faculty services, and to students, toward facilitating quality of the academic experience.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Counseling Psychology. $3 2122842
650 4 $a Social sciences education. $3 2144735
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
690 $a 0603
690 $a 0534
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a Capella University. $b Psychology. $3 1037267
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 80-03B(E).
790 $a 1351
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10842215