東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Subjective Experience of Inner S...

Fama, Mackenzie Elizabeth.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Subjective Experience of Inner Speech in Aphasia.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Subjective Experience of Inner Speech in Aphasia./
作者:	Fama, Mackenzie Elizabeth.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	189 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-11B(E).
標題:	Neurosciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10827928
ISBN:	9780438111134

The Subjective Experience of Inner Speech in Aphasia.
Fama, Mackenzie Elizabeth.

The Subjective Experience of Inner Speech in Aphasia. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 189 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2018.

All individuals with aphasia experience some level of anomia, or difficulty with naming and word finding, but many report that their internal word knowledge exceeds their spoken output, making comments like, "I know it but I can't say it" or even more specifically, "I can say it in my head" (but not aloud). Such comments align with processing models of naming, which include multiple stages of lexical retrieval and post-lexical output processing. Given that anomia can arise from impairments at any one (or more) of the processing stages, it is conceivable that feelings of intact lexical knowledge reported by people with aphasia reflect success in the early stages, despite overt anomia resulting from impairment at a later stage.

ISBN: 9780438111134Subjects--Topical Terms:

588700
Neurosciences.

The Subjective Experience of Inner Speech in Aphasia.
LDR:03228nmm a2200325 4500 001 2200372
005 20190215110917.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438111134
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10827928
035 $a (MiAaPQ)georgetown:14065
035 $a AAI10827928
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fama, Mackenzie Elizabeth. $0 (orcid)0000-0001-8549-7623 $3 3427119
245 1 4 $a The Subjective Experience of Inner Speech in Aphasia.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 189 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: B.
500 $a Advisers: Peter E. Turkeltaub; Rhonda B. Friedman.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2018.
520 $a All individuals with aphasia experience some level of anomia, or difficulty with naming and word finding, but many report that their internal word knowledge exceeds their spoken output, making comments like, "I know it but I can't say it" or even more specifically, "I can say it in my head" (but not aloud). Such comments align with processing models of naming, which include multiple stages of lexical retrieval and post-lexical output processing. Given that anomia can arise from impairments at any one (or more) of the processing stages, it is conceivable that feelings of intact lexical knowledge reported by people with aphasia reflect success in the early stages, despite overt anomia resulting from impairment at a later stage.
520 $a In this dissertation, I examine the specific experience of "inner speech" (IS), defined in this context as a sense of being able to say a word in one's head, regardless of subsequent ability to say that word aloud. Our hypotheses are that (1) the subjective experience of IS in aphasia reflects the status of lexical (phonological) retrieval and (2) IS itself does not rely on post-lexical stages of naming, so a failure of naming following successful IS results from deficits at the level of post-lexical output processing. Two approaches are used to elicit self-reports of IS from individuals with aphasia: an interview-based approach regarding the general experience of IS and an item-by-item approach in the context of silent naming. Self-reported IS is then compared to structural brain imaging and objective language measures related to the mental processes of naming (e.g., tasks emphasizing retrieval vs. output, error patterns, and psycholinguistic properties of words). The results of these studies consistently support the hypotheses, showing that self-reported IS relates to measures of phonological retrieval but not articulatory processing.
520 $a Overall, the findings of these studies support a theory in which the experience of successful IS arises in conjunction with lexical retrieval and does not require articulatory processing. This work has potential implications for clinical decision-making in the treatment of anomia as well as for our general scientific understanding of the nature of IS.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Neurosciences. $3 588700
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
690 $a 0317
690 $a 0460
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Neuroscience. $3 1682785
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-11B(E).
790 $a 0076
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10827928