東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Mapping Soils of the Uasin Gishu Pla...

Ngunjiri, Mercy W.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Mapping Soils of the Uasin Gishu Plateau, Kenya with Limited Data Using a Knowledge-based Inference Mapping Approach.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Mapping Soils of the Uasin Gishu Plateau, Kenya with Limited Data Using a Knowledge-based Inference Mapping Approach./
作者:	Ngunjiri, Mercy W.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	156 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International80-01B(E).
標題:	Soil sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10841450
ISBN:	9780438332386

Mapping Soils of the Uasin Gishu Plateau, Kenya with Limited Data Using a Knowledge-based Inference Mapping Approach.
Ngunjiri, Mercy W.

Mapping Soils of the Uasin Gishu Plateau, Kenya with Limited Data Using a Knowledge-based Inference Mapping Approach. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 156 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 2018.

Kenya has a current population of ~47 million people living on an arable land area of ~56,000 km2 (~1.7 times the area of Indiana). With an annual growth rate of ~800,000 people, there is tremendous pressure on the soil resource to produce more food. Understanding the available soil resources is important to increase and sustain agricultural productivity. Soil surveys made with traditional approaches are too expensive, and new surveys must rely on limited data, legacy information and new digital mapping techniques. We used three knowledge-based inference soil mapping approaches to predict soil types and properties for the Uasin Gishu Plateau in western Kenya. Available data included legacy soil surveys, expert knowledge, aerial imagery, terrain attributes, and landform pattern recognition and classification based on geomorphons. Terrain attributes, including slope gradient, multi-resolution valley bottom flatness index, multi-resolution ridgetop flatness index, topographic position index, elevation, and profile curvature, were calculated from the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) 30 m digital elevation model (DEM) and then used to quantify soil-landscape relationships. The k-means clustering and fuzzy logic soil mapping approaches were utilized to model soil-landscape relationships to produce raster-based maps of predicted soil types, effective soil depth, soil moisture storage capacity, and soil drainage classes. The fuzzy logic soil type map performed slightly better (kappa coefficient, k = 0.68; overall accuracy = 0.76) than the map based on k-means clustering analysis (k =0.59; overall accuracy=0.68). The accuracy for the effective soil depth map based on fuzzy logic was better (R2 = 0.56; RMSE = 11; ME = 1.1) compared to the best existing soil map (R 2 = 0.34; RMSE = 27; ME = 8). The third mapping approach was based on landform pattern recognition and classification using geomorphons calculated from the 30 m SRTM DEM using the module r.geomorphons "add-on" in GRASS GIS with look up distance (L) values of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100 cells and a flatness threshold of 0.5 degrees. An L value of 20 cells performed best (k = 0.52; overall accuracy = 0.62) followed by an L value of 30 cells ( k = 0.50; overall accuracy = 0.58). The L value of 30 cells, however, better captured the geomorphology and soil-landscape relationships based on expert knowledge, legacy data, and the fact that the bottomlands pattern was more continuous than for an L value of 20 cells. Of the three approaches, the fuzzy logic approach performed better and produced a map that best represents the soil-landscape relationships on the Uasin Gishu Plateau. The results of these studies produced more spatially detailed, higher resolution soil maps compared to the existing soil maps, and these new maps are likely to be more useful for soil, crop and land use management decisions.

ISBN: 9780438332386Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122699
Soil sciences.

Mapping Soils of the Uasin Gishu Plateau, Kenya with Limited Data Using a Knowledge-based Inference Mapping Approach.
LDR:03903nmm a2200301 4500 001 2200278
005 20181214130637.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438332386
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10841450
035 $a (MiAaPQ)purdue:23030
035 $a AAI10841450
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ngunjiri, Mercy W. $3 3427026
245 1 0 $a Mapping Soils of the Uasin Gishu Plateau, Kenya with Limited Data Using a Knowledge-based Inference Mapping Approach.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 156 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Darrell G. Schulze.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 2018.
520 $a Kenya has a current population of ~47 million people living on an arable land area of ~56,000 km2 (~1.7 times the area of Indiana). With an annual growth rate of ~800,000 people, there is tremendous pressure on the soil resource to produce more food. Understanding the available soil resources is important to increase and sustain agricultural productivity. Soil surveys made with traditional approaches are too expensive, and new surveys must rely on limited data, legacy information and new digital mapping techniques. We used three knowledge-based inference soil mapping approaches to predict soil types and properties for the Uasin Gishu Plateau in western Kenya. Available data included legacy soil surveys, expert knowledge, aerial imagery, terrain attributes, and landform pattern recognition and classification based on geomorphons. Terrain attributes, including slope gradient, multi-resolution valley bottom flatness index, multi-resolution ridgetop flatness index, topographic position index, elevation, and profile curvature, were calculated from the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) 30 m digital elevation model (DEM) and then used to quantify soil-landscape relationships. The k-means clustering and fuzzy logic soil mapping approaches were utilized to model soil-landscape relationships to produce raster-based maps of predicted soil types, effective soil depth, soil moisture storage capacity, and soil drainage classes. The fuzzy logic soil type map performed slightly better (kappa coefficient, k = 0.68; overall accuracy = 0.76) than the map based on k-means clustering analysis (k =0.59; overall accuracy=0.68). The accuracy for the effective soil depth map based on fuzzy logic was better (R2 = 0.56; RMSE = 11; ME = 1.1) compared to the best existing soil map (R 2 = 0.34; RMSE = 27; ME = 8). The third mapping approach was based on landform pattern recognition and classification using geomorphons calculated from the 30 m SRTM DEM using the module r.geomorphons "add-on" in GRASS GIS with look up distance (L) values of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100 cells and a flatness threshold of 0.5 degrees. An L value of 20 cells performed best (k = 0.52; overall accuracy = 0.62) followed by an L value of 30 cells ( k = 0.50; overall accuracy = 0.58). The L value of 30 cells, however, better captured the geomorphology and soil-landscape relationships based on expert knowledge, legacy data, and the fact that the bottomlands pattern was more continuous than for an L value of 20 cells. Of the three approaches, the fuzzy logic approach performed better and produced a map that best represents the soil-landscape relationships on the Uasin Gishu Plateau. The results of these studies produced more spatially detailed, higher resolution soil maps compared to the existing soil maps, and these new maps are likely to be more useful for soil, crop and land use management decisions.
590 $a School code: 0183.
650 4 $a Soil sciences. $3 2122699
650 4 $a Agronomy. $3 2122783
690 $a 0481
690 $a 0285
710 2 $a Purdue University. $b Agronomy. $3 1671815
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 80-01B(E).
790 $a 0183
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10841450