東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Myth and Reality during an Era of Po...

St. Hilaire, Jack.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Myth and Reality during an Era of Police Accreditation in the United States.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Myth and Reality during an Era of Police Accreditation in the United States./
作者:	St. Hilaire, Jack.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	276 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International80-04A(E).
標題:	Sociology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10790933
ISBN:	9780438696426

Myth and Reality during an Era of Police Accreditation in the United States.
St. Hilaire, Jack.

Myth and Reality during an Era of Police Accreditation in the United States. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 276 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University, 2018.

A qualitative study on the strategic decision processes in law enforcement by examining the reasons why law enforcement executives in the United States choose to either participate or not to participate in national police accreditation, known as CALEA (Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies), for their agencies. Police accreditation was introduced into the United States as part of an overall strategy to raise the professional status of law enforcement agencies by standardizing operating procedures. In 1979, through support from the U.S. Department of Justice four major professional police associations, the International Chiefs of Police Association (IACP), the National Association of Black Law Enforcement Executives (NOBLE), the National Sheriffs' Association (NSA), and the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), created a national accrediting body for the police, CALEA. CALEA subsequently established national police standards for law enforcement agencies in the United States which have continually evolved over the years.

ISBN: 9780438696426Subjects--Topical Terms:

516174
Sociology.

Myth and Reality during an Era of Police Accreditation in the United States.
LDR:03688nmm a2200349 4500 001 2200224
005 20181214130636.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438696426
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10790933
035 $a (MiAaPQ)bu:13821
035 $a AAI10790933
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a St. Hilaire, Jack. $3 3426972
245 1 0 $a Myth and Reality during an Era of Police Accreditation in the United States.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 276 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Emily Barman; Nazli Kibria.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University, 2018.
520 $a A qualitative study on the strategic decision processes in law enforcement by examining the reasons why law enforcement executives in the United States choose to either participate or not to participate in national police accreditation, known as CALEA (Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies), for their agencies. Police accreditation was introduced into the United States as part of an overall strategy to raise the professional status of law enforcement agencies by standardizing operating procedures. In 1979, through support from the U.S. Department of Justice four major professional police associations, the International Chiefs of Police Association (IACP), the National Association of Black Law Enforcement Executives (NOBLE), the National Sheriffs' Association (NSA), and the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), created a national accrediting body for the police, CALEA. CALEA subsequently established national police standards for law enforcement agencies in the United States which have continually evolved over the years.
520 $a After almost forty years, however, only a small percentage of law enforcement agencies in the United States are nationally accredited. In the meantime, research on accreditation in general as well as on police performance and effectiveness suggests that there are few measurable differences between accredited and non-accredited organizations in performance and resource allocation while these studies have provided limited impact on organizational cultures and informal structures. Nonetheless, accreditation's symbolic value of professionalism as a means to maintain legitimacy and stability for the organization and its leaders in police circles is difficult to quantify and should not be underestimated. There may be hidden benefits with accreditation that are difficult to measure. Thus, they have not yet been realized.
520 $a The study assesses the role of choices and accountability qualitatively through intensive interviews with twenty-eight law enforcement leaders from both accredited and non-accredited law enforcement agencies of various sizes and type. These are drawn from five geographic areas in the United States and include local police departments, sheriffs' offices, primary state authorities, transportation police, and campus law enforcement. This study uses an abductive approach to identify and analyze the variables involved in the decisions made about accreditation. The data developed are used to test three relevant theories of organization concerning the relationship between agency and structure in order to provide a more cogent explanation for organizational choices and direction.
590 $a School code: 0017.
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
650 4 $a Law enforcement. $3 607408
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0206
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0617
710 2 $a Boston University. $b Sociology. $3 3171430
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 80-04A(E).
790 $a 0017
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10790933