東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Nuremberg Paradox: How the Trial...

Ross, Joseph A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Nuremberg Paradox: How the Trial of the Nazis Challenged American Support of International Human Rights Law = = Das Nurnberger Paradox: Wie der Prozess gegen die Nazis die amerikanische Unterstutzung des internationalen Menschenrechtsrechts in Frage stellte.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Nuremberg Paradox: How the Trial of the Nazis Challenged American Support of International Human Rights Law =/
其他題名:	Das Nurnberger Paradox: Wie der Prozess gegen die Nazis die amerikanische Unterstutzung des internationalen Menschenrechtsrechts in Frage stellte.
作者:	Ross, Joseph A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	395 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-11A(E).
標題:	American history. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10751703
ISBN:	9780438087224

The Nuremberg Paradox: How the Trial of the Nazis Challenged American Support of International Human Rights Law = = Das Nurnberger Paradox: Wie der Prozess gegen die Nazis die amerikanische Unterstutzung des internationalen Menschenrechtsrechts in Frage stellte.
Ross, Joseph A.

The Nuremberg Paradox: How the Trial of the Nazis Challenged American Support of International Human Rights Law =Das Nurnberger Paradox: Wie der Prozess gegen die Nazis die amerikanische Unterstutzung des internationalen Menschenrechtsrechts in Frage stellte. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 395 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2018.

This dissertation is an intellectual and legal history that traces the evolution of human rights concepts by focusing on American participants who were at the center of the Nuremberg Trial---Robert Jackson, Francis Biddle, and John Parker. It addresses questions such as: What impact did the Nuremberg Trial have on international human rights law in the postwar period? How did Jackson, Biddle, and Parker understand human rights, national sovereignty, international law, and international engagement before the Trial? Did their views change as a result of their Nuremberg experiences? What challenges, if any, did they face in upholding human rights when they returned home?

ISBN: 9780438087224Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122692
American history.

The Nuremberg Paradox: How the Trial of the Nazis Challenged American Support of International Human Rights Law = = Das Nurnberger Paradox: Wie der Prozess gegen die Nazis die amerikanische Unterstutzung des internationalen Menschenrechtsrechts in Frage stellte.
LDR:03172nmm a2200325 4500 001 2199766
005 20181029135741.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438087224
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10751703
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uncg:12448
035 $a AAI10751703
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ross, Joseph A. $0 (orcid)0000-0003-1934-085X $3 3426511
245 1 4 $a The Nuremberg Paradox: How the Trial of the Nazis Challenged American Support of International Human Rights Law = $b Das Nurnberger Paradox: Wie der Prozess gegen die Nazis die amerikanische Unterstutzung des internationalen Menschenrechtsrechts in Frage stellte.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 395 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Mark E. Elliott.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2018.
520 $a This dissertation is an intellectual and legal history that traces the evolution of human rights concepts by focusing on American participants who were at the center of the Nuremberg Trial---Robert Jackson, Francis Biddle, and John Parker. It addresses questions such as: What impact did the Nuremberg Trial have on international human rights law in the postwar period? How did Jackson, Biddle, and Parker understand human rights, national sovereignty, international law, and international engagement before the Trial? Did their views change as a result of their Nuremberg experiences? What challenges, if any, did they face in upholding human rights when they returned home?
520 $a The answers to these questions reveal a key paradox surrounding Nuremberg. A paradox seems to contradict generally received opinion yet is still true, which is an apt description of the Nuremberg Trial. It was a pivotal moment in the development of international human rights law, and of the U.S. commitment to internationalism. One way of measuring Nuremberg's importance is through the impact it had on Jackson, Biddle, and Parker's thinking after the Trial ended. These men had already endorsed the idea of "crimes against humanity" and the need for international trials before they received their appointments, which is part of the reason why they were chosen. At Nuremberg, they confronted atrocities of such an extreme nature that they devoted themselves to the Trial's great purpose: that "never again" would the world allow this to happen. Aggressive war, genocide, racial and religious persecution were among the worst crimes that had to be eradicated. Paradoxically, though, while each participant demonstrated an enhanced commitment to human rights after the Trial, each one also faced his own challenges in applying these principles at home. Jackson faltered on anti-communism, and Parker on civil rights. Only Biddle out of the three went the furthest in consistently advocating human rights.
590 $a School code: 0154.
650 4 $a American history. $3 2122692
650 4 $a European history. $2 bicssc $3 1972904
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0335
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. $b History. $3 3426512
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-11A(E).
790 $a 0154
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10751703