東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Understanding Military Doctrinal Cha...

Gallo, Andrew A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Understanding Military Doctrinal Change during Peacetime.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Understanding Military Doctrinal Change during Peacetime./
作者:	Gallo, Andrew A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	353 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-08A(E).
標題:	International relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10747658
ISBN:	9780355788464

Understanding Military Doctrinal Change during Peacetime.
Gallo, Andrew A.

Understanding Military Doctrinal Change during Peacetime. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 353 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2018.

This study examines processes of military doctrinal change during periods of peace. Given the conventional wisdom of hidebound bureaucratic military organizations, why do these organizations innovate doctrinally? Rather than conduct competitive hypothesis testing between two or more theories of military innovation or pursue a heretofore undiscovered monocausal theory, I develop and test a theoretical framework that synthesizes more than one approach to military doctrinal innovation. I use this framework to conduct a structured, focused, case-study comparison of two military organizations---the U.S. Army and the U.S. Marine Corps---from the post-World War II period until 2001. The study yields seven findings. First, the systemic causes of military doctrinal innovation are best described by balance of threat theory. Second, contrary to the existing literature, civilian intervention is not a necessary or sufficient cause of doctrinal innovation. Third, militaries consistently strive to establish a monopoly over warfare in a particular jurisdictional domain. Fourth, the frequency of military doctrinal change is a function of the complexity of the strategic problem that doctrine is designed to solve. Fifth, the complexity of the cases studied supports the argument that monocausal explanations fail to account for the interaction of multiple variables that affect doctrinal innovation. Sixth, military doctrinal innovation during peacetime is not anomalous because military organizations constantly revise their theories of victory as threats change in the external environment. Finally, the existence of doctrinal institutions creates a norm for a reliance on military doctrine.

ISBN: 9780355788464Subjects--Topical Terms:

531762
International relations.

Understanding Military Doctrinal Change during Peacetime.
LDR:02643nmm a2200313 4500 001 2199747
005 20181029135740.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355788464
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10747658
035 $a (MiAaPQ)columbia:14473
035 $a AAI10747658
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gallo, Andrew A. $3 3426492
245 1 0 $a Understanding Military Doctrinal Change during Peacetime.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 353 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Richard K. Betts.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2018.
520 $a This study examines processes of military doctrinal change during periods of peace. Given the conventional wisdom of hidebound bureaucratic military organizations, why do these organizations innovate doctrinally? Rather than conduct competitive hypothesis testing between two or more theories of military innovation or pursue a heretofore undiscovered monocausal theory, I develop and test a theoretical framework that synthesizes more than one approach to military doctrinal innovation. I use this framework to conduct a structured, focused, case-study comparison of two military organizations---the U.S. Army and the U.S. Marine Corps---from the post-World War II period until 2001. The study yields seven findings. First, the systemic causes of military doctrinal innovation are best described by balance of threat theory. Second, contrary to the existing literature, civilian intervention is not a necessary or sufficient cause of doctrinal innovation. Third, militaries consistently strive to establish a monopoly over warfare in a particular jurisdictional domain. Fourth, the frequency of military doctrinal change is a function of the complexity of the strategic problem that doctrine is designed to solve. Fifth, the complexity of the cases studied supports the argument that monocausal explanations fail to account for the interaction of multiple variables that affect doctrinal innovation. Sixth, military doctrinal innovation during peacetime is not anomalous because military organizations constantly revise their theories of victory as threats change in the external environment. Finally, the existence of doctrinal institutions creates a norm for a reliance on military doctrine.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a International relations. $3 531762
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0750
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Political Science. $3 1677427
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-08A(E).
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10747658