東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Agenda-Defending of Candidate-Owned ...

Kim, Cheonsoo.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Agenda-Defending of Candidate-Owned Facebook: An Investigation of the 2016 Presidential Primary.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Agenda-Defending of Candidate-Owned Facebook: An Investigation of the 2016 Presidential Primary./
作者:	Kim, Cheonsoo.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	187 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-07A(E).
標題:	Journalism. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10743804
ISBN:	9780355647914

Agenda-Defending of Candidate-Owned Facebook: An Investigation of the 2016 Presidential Primary.
Kim, Cheonsoo.

Agenda-Defending of Candidate-Owned Facebook: An Investigation of the 2016 Presidential Primary. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 187 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2018.

This study investigated political consequences of direct communication on Facebook. For this, it introduced a new concept: Agenda-defending. It refers to the practice of candidate-owned Facebook in political campaigns to keep the candidate agenda among Facebook users consuming candidate information directly. News media offer candidates a broader audience but candidates cannot control news. From a candidate standpoint, the uncontrollability of news can cause undesirable and negative effects on voters' perceptions. Direct communication on Facebook allows candidates to disseminate controlled messages to voters, which can generate effects that mitigate news media's agenda-setting effects on Facebook users. Textual data on the 2016 primaries of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders were analyzed. Four types of unstructured texts and public opinion data were collected.

ISBN: 9780355647914Subjects--Topical Terms:

576107
Journalism.

Agenda-Defending of Candidate-Owned Facebook: An Investigation of the 2016 Presidential Primary.
LDR:03527nmm a2200337 4500 001 2199733
005 20181029135740.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355647914
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10743804
035 $a (MiAaPQ)indiana:15083
035 $a AAI10743804
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kim, Cheonsoo. $3 3426478
245 1 0 $a Agenda-Defending of Candidate-Owned Facebook: An Investigation of the 2016 Presidential Primary.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 187 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Sung-Un Yang; Jae Kook Lee.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2018.
520 $a This study investigated political consequences of direct communication on Facebook. For this, it introduced a new concept: Agenda-defending. It refers to the practice of candidate-owned Facebook in political campaigns to keep the candidate agenda among Facebook users consuming candidate information directly. News media offer candidates a broader audience but candidates cannot control news. From a candidate standpoint, the uncontrollability of news can cause undesirable and negative effects on voters' perceptions. Direct communication on Facebook allows candidates to disseminate controlled messages to voters, which can generate effects that mitigate news media's agenda-setting effects on Facebook users. Textual data on the 2016 primaries of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders were analyzed. Four types of unstructured texts and public opinion data were collected.
520 $a Textual data include press releases in candidate websites, candidate Facebook posts, and individuals' comments on Facebook of each candidate, news articles by the top 3 U.S. press. As public opinion data, 12 monthly Gallup poll results were employed. Each data set was analyzed using big data analytics and compared to each other in terms of campaign agendas.
520 $a Findings evidenced agenda-defending of candidate-owned Facebook. First, the candidate agenda was correlated to Facebook user's agenda, which is greater than between the candidate- and the public agenda. This suggests direct communication on Facebook is more effective than indirect communication through news media. Second, the effect of press releases on the media agenda was greater than Facebook posts, suggesting candidate-owned Facebook is less effective than press releases in terms of agenda-building. Third, although candidate-owned Facebook is a venue where supporters can gather and share congenial opinions, agenda-defending do not occur spontaneously. If candidates fail to give them proper information, candidate-owned Facebook cannot generate agenda-defending.
520 $a The agenda-defending concept is useful to explain the political role of Facebook as a direct conduit for campaign information between candidates and voters. At a party/candidate level, it pertains to how parties and candidates can use the ability of Facebook for direct communication to affect voters cognitively. At a public opinion level, the concept bears on how candidate-owned Facebook contributes fragmentation/balkanization of public opinion in Facebook networks during political campaigns.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Journalism. $3 576107
650 4 $a Mass communication. $3 2144804
690 $a 0391
690 $a 0708
710 2 $a Indiana University. $b Journalism. $3 1683561
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-07A(E).
790 $a 0093
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10743804