東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Computation as a Model Building Tool...

Stirewalt, Heather R.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Computation as a Model Building Tool in a High School Physics Classroom.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Computation as a Model Building Tool in a High School Physics Classroom./
作者:	Stirewalt, Heather R.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	87 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 58-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International58-01(E).
標題:	Physics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10785706
ISBN:	9780438196384

Computation as a Model Building Tool in a High School Physics Classroom.
Stirewalt, Heather R.

Computation as a Model Building Tool in a High School Physics Classroom. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 87 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 58-01.

Thesis (M.S.)--California State University, Long Beach, 2018.

The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) have established computational thinking as one of the science and engineering practices that should be developed in high school classrooms. Much of the work done by scientists is accomplished through the use of computation, but many students leave high school with little to no exposure to coding of any kind. This study outlines an attempt to integrate computational physics lessons into a high school algebra-based physics course which utilizes Modeling Instruction. Specifically, it aims to determine if students who complete computational physics assignments demonstrate any difference in understanding force concepts as measured by the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) versus students who do not. Additionally, it investigates students' attitudes about learning computation alongside physics. Students were introduced to Vpython programs during the course of a semester. The FCI was administered pre and post instruction, and the gains were measured against a control group. The Computational Modeling in Physics Attitudinal Student Survey (COMPASS) was administered post instruction and the responses were analyzed. While the FCI gains were slightly larger on average than the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. This at least suggests that incorporating computational physics assignments does not adversely affect students' conceptual learning.

ISBN: 9780438196384Subjects--Topical Terms:

516296
Physics.

Computation as a Model Building Tool in a High School Physics Classroom.
LDR:02387nmm a2200313 4500 001 2165222
005 20181129120547.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438196384
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10785706
035 $a (MiAaPQ)csulb:12419
035 $a AAI10785706
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Stirewalt, Heather R. $3 3353288
245 1 0 $a Computation as a Model Building Tool in a High School Physics Classroom.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 87 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 58-01.
500 $a Advisers: Laura Henriques; Zoltan Papp.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--California State University, Long Beach, 2018.
520 $a The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) have established computational thinking as one of the science and engineering practices that should be developed in high school classrooms. Much of the work done by scientists is accomplished through the use of computation, but many students leave high school with little to no exposure to coding of any kind. This study outlines an attempt to integrate computational physics lessons into a high school algebra-based physics course which utilizes Modeling Instruction. Specifically, it aims to determine if students who complete computational physics assignments demonstrate any difference in understanding force concepts as measured by the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) versus students who do not. Additionally, it investigates students' attitudes about learning computation alongside physics. Students were introduced to Vpython programs during the course of a semester. The FCI was administered pre and post instruction, and the gains were measured against a control group. The Computational Modeling in Physics Attitudinal Student Survey (COMPASS) was administered post instruction and the responses were analyzed. While the FCI gains were slightly larger on average than the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. This at least suggests that incorporating computational physics assignments does not adversely affect students' conceptual learning.
590 $a School code: 6080.
650 4 $a Physics. $3 516296
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Computational physics. $3 3343998
690 $a 0605
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0216
710 2 $a California State University, Long Beach. $b Physics and Astronomy. $3 2096637
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 58-01(E).
790 $a 6080
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10785706