語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Justice under constraints: The natur...
~
McCalpin, Jermaine O.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Justice under constraints: The nature of transitional justice in deeply divided societies.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Justice under constraints: The nature of transitional justice in deeply divided societies./
作者:
McCalpin, Jermaine O.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2006,
面頁冊數:
239 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-08, Section: A, page: 3140.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International67-08A.
標題:
Political science. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3227887
ISBN:
9780542820670
Justice under constraints: The nature of transitional justice in deeply divided societies.
McCalpin, Jermaine O.
Justice under constraints: The nature of transitional justice in deeply divided societies.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2006 - 239 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-08, Section: A, page: 3140.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Brown University, 2006.
This dissertation is an examination of transitional justice in deeply divided societies with a particular emphasis on South Africa. Given the complexities of the transition from authoritarianism to democracy, a special model of justice is necessary between these two political orders. Although the ideal model of societal justice is democratic justice, it is unlikely in the transition to democracy. Nonetheless a model of justice is necessary to function as a viable transitional justice model while preparing the way for democratic justice as the eventual model of justice. In this regard I detail two candidate theories of transitional justice: restorative and retributive justice. I conclude that given the particularities of the South African transitional situation neither restorative nor retributive justice are viable as transitional justice because they end up primarily focusing on the moral/political aspect of equality while neglecting or demeaning the necessity of material equality in a society so marred and inundated by socio-economic inequality. The main conclusion reached is that Apartheid in South Africa amounted to a historic injustice which can only be rectified through a transitional model I develop called reparative justice. It is superior to the previous models of transitional justice because it gives primacy to the material considerations of justice for the transitional period. The mechanism most likely to achieve material equality is through a comprehensive policy of reparations that would aim to rectify historic injustice suffered by blacks in South Africa.
ISBN: 9780542820670Subjects--Topical Terms:
528916
Political science.
Justice under constraints: The nature of transitional justice in deeply divided societies.
LDR
:02532nmm a2200301 4500
001
2164196
005
20181030085012.5
008
190424s2006 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9780542820670
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI3227887
035
$a
AAI3227887
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
McCalpin, Jermaine O.
$3
3352241
245
1 0
$a
Justice under constraints: The nature of transitional justice in deeply divided societies.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2006
300
$a
239 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-08, Section: A, page: 3140.
500
$a
Adviser: John Tomasi.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Brown University, 2006.
520
$a
This dissertation is an examination of transitional justice in deeply divided societies with a particular emphasis on South Africa. Given the complexities of the transition from authoritarianism to democracy, a special model of justice is necessary between these two political orders. Although the ideal model of societal justice is democratic justice, it is unlikely in the transition to democracy. Nonetheless a model of justice is necessary to function as a viable transitional justice model while preparing the way for democratic justice as the eventual model of justice. In this regard I detail two candidate theories of transitional justice: restorative and retributive justice. I conclude that given the particularities of the South African transitional situation neither restorative nor retributive justice are viable as transitional justice because they end up primarily focusing on the moral/political aspect of equality while neglecting or demeaning the necessity of material equality in a society so marred and inundated by socio-economic inequality. The main conclusion reached is that Apartheid in South Africa amounted to a historic injustice which can only be rectified through a transitional model I develop called reparative justice. It is superior to the previous models of transitional justice because it gives primacy to the material considerations of justice for the transitional period. The mechanism most likely to achieve material equality is through a comprehensive policy of reparations that would aim to rectify historic injustice suffered by blacks in South Africa.
590
$a
School code: 0024.
650
4
$a
Political science.
$3
528916
650
4
$a
International law.
$3
560784
650
4
$a
Ethnic studies.
$2
bicssc
$3
1556779
690
$a
0615
690
$a
0616
690
$a
0631
710
2
$a
Brown University.
$3
766761
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
67-08A.
790
$a
0024
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2006
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3227887
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9363743
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入