東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Assessment of Policy Alternatives fo...

Yildiz, Bilgehan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption./
作者:	Yildiz, Bilgehan.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	230 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-11A(E).
標題:	Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10825203
ISBN:	9780438140332

Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption.
Yildiz, Bilgehan.

Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 230 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Portland State University, 2018.

Electric Vehicle (EV) has become an increasingly important topic in recent years due to energy and environmental concerns. Governments started to focus on remedies to the upcoming climate change threat and seek solutions through policies and regulations. The negative impact of carbon emissions along with pressure from governmental and social organizations force automotive manufacturers to shift to alternative energy sources. However, EV transition is a complex problem because its stakeholders are very diverse including governments, policy makers, EV manufacturers, and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs). Consequently, the barriers to EV adoption are not only consumer oriented, rather exist under many categories. The literature has yet to offer a comprehensive, quantified list of barriers to EV adoption. Although the enacted policies are known, the effectiveness of these policies in mitigating EV adoption is not known.

ISBN: 9780438140332Subjects--Topical Terms:

516664
Management.

Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption.
LDR:03509nmm a2200349 4500 001 2163376
005 20181022132249.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438140332
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10825203
035 $a (MiAaPQ)psu:12113
035 $a AAI10825203
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Yildiz, Bilgehan. $3 3351394
245 1 0 $a Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 230 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Dundar F. Kocaoglu.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Portland State University, 2018.
520 $a Electric Vehicle (EV) has become an increasingly important topic in recent years due to energy and environmental concerns. Governments started to focus on remedies to the upcoming climate change threat and seek solutions through policies and regulations. The negative impact of carbon emissions along with pressure from governmental and social organizations force automotive manufacturers to shift to alternative energy sources. However, EV transition is a complex problem because its stakeholders are very diverse including governments, policy makers, EV manufacturers, and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs). Consequently, the barriers to EV adoption are not only consumer oriented, rather exist under many categories. The literature has yet to offer a comprehensive, quantified list of barriers to EV adoption. Although the enacted policies are known, the effectiveness of these policies in mitigating EV adoption is not known.
520 $a The objective of this research is to assess policy alternatives for mitigation of EV adoption barriers by developing a comprehensive evaluation model. Barriers are grouped under Social, Technical, Environmental, Economic and Political (STEEP) perspectives that are perceived by decision makers as important for adoption process. The decision model of research links the perspectives to barriers, and policy alternatives. The research implements the hierarchical decision model (HDM) to construct a generalized policy assessment framework.
520 $a Data for EV adoption barriers were collected from the abovementioned stakeholders.
520 $a Experts' qualitative judgments were collected and quantified using the pair-wise comparison method. The final rankings and effectiveness of policy alternatives were calculated. This research's results showed that the most important perspective is Economic. The top three most important barriers to EV adoption were identified as Initial Cost, Battery Cost, and Entrenched Technology Resistance, respectively. The most effective policy in mitigating EV adoption barriers is R&D Incentives. The research also extended the policy effectiveness research with Policy Effectiveness Curves by reaching out to additional experts. These curves helped determine the effectiveness of each of the 6 policies at different implementation levels. Based on these results, 25 scenarios were applied by combinations of policies at different implementation levels to investigate how the effectiveness of policies can change compared to today's conditions.
590 $a School code: 0180.
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Automotive engineering. $3 2181195
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 3168311
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0540
690 $a 0310
710 2 $a Portland State University. $b Engineering and Technology Management. $3 2096494
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-11A(E).
790 $a 0180
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10825203