東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Evaluating the Relationship between ...

Stoddard, Grant.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evaluating the Relationship between Hoof Trimming and Dairy Cattle Well-being.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evaluating the Relationship between Hoof Trimming and Dairy Cattle Well-being./
作者:	Stoddard, Grant.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	156 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09B(E).
標題:	Animal sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10749476
ISBN:	9780355860542

Evaluating the Relationship between Hoof Trimming and Dairy Cattle Well-being.
Stoddard, Grant.

Evaluating the Relationship between Hoof Trimming and Dairy Cattle Well-being. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 156 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2018.

The aim of this thesis was to provide knowledge to the dairy industry about HT and to provide science based recommendations on if LIT or BIG model is more effective at preventing lameness and lesions. Based on the results from this thesis it was shown that the HT process is associated with behavior changes and causes an acute stress response and decreases milk yield. Based on the results of these objectives the acute stress response is due to restraint, not the actual removal of horn during the HT process. The decrease in milk yield that was observed after HT needs further research to determine what effect disruption of the cow's day with no access to feed has on milk yield. In addition, we compared a HT technique that is currently used in the industry to an adaptation that increased the modeling on the weight bearing claw. Based on a subset analysis, this adaptation was protective for hoof horn lesions and lameness for cows trimmed at the end of their first lactation. However, there was no difference between the two HT techniques for long term milk yield and culling risk. The final conclusion was BIG model is more effective at preventing hoof horn lesions than the LIT model, and there was no evidence that BIG model (vs LIT) was detrimental to the welfare of the cow based on milk yield and culling risk.

ISBN: 9780355860542Subjects--Topical Terms:

3174829
Animal sciences.

Evaluating the Relationship between Hoof Trimming and Dairy Cattle Well-being.
LDR:02264nmm a2200289 4500 001 2162923
005 20181012133446.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355860542
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10749476
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umn:19037
035 $a AAI10749476
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Stoddard, Grant. $3 3350922
245 1 0 $a Evaluating the Relationship between Hoof Trimming and Dairy Cattle Well-being.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 156 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: B.
500 $a Advisers: Gerard Cramer; Sandra Godden.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2018.
520 $a The aim of this thesis was to provide knowledge to the dairy industry about HT and to provide science based recommendations on if LIT or BIG model is more effective at preventing lameness and lesions. Based on the results from this thesis it was shown that the HT process is associated with behavior changes and causes an acute stress response and decreases milk yield. Based on the results of these objectives the acute stress response is due to restraint, not the actual removal of horn during the HT process. The decrease in milk yield that was observed after HT needs further research to determine what effect disruption of the cow's day with no access to feed has on milk yield. In addition, we compared a HT technique that is currently used in the industry to an adaptation that increased the modeling on the weight bearing claw. Based on a subset analysis, this adaptation was protective for hoof horn lesions and lameness for cows trimmed at the end of their first lactation. However, there was no difference between the two HT techniques for long term milk yield and culling risk. The final conclusion was BIG model is more effective at preventing hoof horn lesions than the LIT model, and there was no evidence that BIG model (vs LIT) was detrimental to the welfare of the cow based on milk yield and culling risk.
590 $a School code: 0130.
650 4 $a Animal sciences. $3 3174829
690 $a 0475
710 2 $a University of Minnesota. $b Veterinary Medicine. $3 1682756
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09B(E).
790 $a 0130
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10749476