東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Comparison of Growth and Reproductiv...

Sell, Graham Scott.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparison of Growth and Reproductive Traits of Young Growing Beef Bulls Developed on Forage with or without Concentrate Supplementation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comparison of Growth and Reproductive Traits of Young Growing Beef Bulls Developed on Forage with or without Concentrate Supplementation./
作者:	Sell, Graham Scott.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	86 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-04(E).
標題:	Animal sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10641085
ISBN:	9780355619645

Comparison of Growth and Reproductive Traits of Young Growing Beef Bulls Developed on Forage with or without Concentrate Supplementation.
Sell, Graham Scott.

Comparison of Growth and Reproductive Traits of Young Growing Beef Bulls Developed on Forage with or without Concentrate Supplementation. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 86 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-04.

Thesis (M.S.)--Clemson University, 2017.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the growth and reproductive development of young growing beef bulls on a complete forage ration (F) to development of similar young growing beef bulls on a forage ration supplemented with concentrate (CT). Data was collected from the 665 beef bulls, grouped into breed codes (BC) of continental (CN; n = 103) or British (B; n = 562) that participated in the Edisto Forage Bull Test (EFBT) in Blackville, SC from 2006 to 2016 with the exception of 2012. Data from 2012 was lost in a clerical mishap. All Angus, red Angus, and Hereford were classified as British, and all Gelbvieh/Gelbvieh influence, Simmental/Simmental influence, Charolais, and Limousin/Limousin influence were classified as CN. Bulls were tested under two different management systems (MS). The MS from 2006 to 2010 was the CT the bulls a forage ration supplemented with a concentrate at 1% of body weight. From 2011 to 2016 bulls were subjected to an all the F ration. Across all years, the EFBT bulls were weighed as they came on test, and then every 28 days until the final weigh day on day 168 of the test. Variables analyzed were, body weight (BW), scrotal circumference (SC), average daily gain (ADG), Test average daily gain (TADG), weight per day of age at test day 168 (WDA d168), and frame score (FS) at the on test point. Bulls were subjected to a breeding soundness exam prior 332 days after the start of the test, +/-21 days before the sale date. The data set did not include Bos Indicus bulls or bulls (< 50 head) where data was missing or did not finish the test due to illness, injury or death. Data were subjected to LS means with MS, BC, period and their interactions as the main effects with differences determined using Students t-test. Chi-square analysis was utilized to evaluate the breeding soundness data. Generally the study found MS had an effect on BW, ADG, and SC (P < 0.05). In the case SC the effect of MS was present at d112 (P < 0.05) but had lost any effect by d332.

ISBN: 9780355619645Subjects--Topical Terms:

3174829
Animal sciences.

Comparison of Growth and Reproductive Traits of Young Growing Beef Bulls Developed on Forage with or without Concentrate Supplementation.
LDR:03009nmm a2200313 4500 001 2162887
005 20181012133445.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355619645
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10641085
035 $a (MiAaPQ)clemson:14577
035 $a AAI10641085
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sell, Graham Scott. $3 3350884
245 1 0 $a Comparison of Growth and Reproductive Traits of Young Growing Beef Bulls Developed on Forage with or without Concentrate Supplementation.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 86 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-04.
500 $a Adviser: Scott L. Pratt.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Clemson University, 2017.
520 $a The objective of this study was to evaluate the growth and reproductive development of young growing beef bulls on a complete forage ration (F) to development of similar young growing beef bulls on a forage ration supplemented with concentrate (CT). Data was collected from the 665 beef bulls, grouped into breed codes (BC) of continental (CN; n = 103) or British (B; n = 562) that participated in the Edisto Forage Bull Test (EFBT) in Blackville, SC from 2006 to 2016 with the exception of 2012. Data from 2012 was lost in a clerical mishap. All Angus, red Angus, and Hereford were classified as British, and all Gelbvieh/Gelbvieh influence, Simmental/Simmental influence, Charolais, and Limousin/Limousin influence were classified as CN. Bulls were tested under two different management systems (MS). The MS from 2006 to 2010 was the CT the bulls a forage ration supplemented with a concentrate at 1% of body weight. From 2011 to 2016 bulls were subjected to an all the F ration. Across all years, the EFBT bulls were weighed as they came on test, and then every 28 days until the final weigh day on day 168 of the test. Variables analyzed were, body weight (BW), scrotal circumference (SC), average daily gain (ADG), Test average daily gain (TADG), weight per day of age at test day 168 (WDA d168), and frame score (FS) at the on test point. Bulls were subjected to a breeding soundness exam prior 332 days after the start of the test, +/-21 days before the sale date. The data set did not include Bos Indicus bulls or bulls (< 50 head) where data was missing or did not finish the test due to illness, injury or death. Data were subjected to LS means with MS, BC, period and their interactions as the main effects with differences determined using Students t-test. Chi-square analysis was utilized to evaluate the breeding soundness data. Generally the study found MS had an effect on BW, ADG, and SC (P < 0.05). In the case SC the effect of MS was present at d112 (P < 0.05) but had lost any effect by d332.
590 $a School code: 0050.
650 4 $a Animal sciences. $3 3174829
650 4 $a Agriculture. $3 518588
650 4 $a Veterinary science. $3 3172798
690 $a 0475
690 $a 0473
690 $a 0778
710 2 $a Clemson University. $b Animal and Veterinary Sciences. $3 1671748
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-04(E).
790 $a 0050
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10641085