東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Consent versus controversy: Communic...

Dixson, Mary Campbell.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Consent versus controversy: Communication, conflict and the teaching of citizenship.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Consent versus controversy: Communication, conflict and the teaching of citizenship./
作者:	Dixson, Mary Campbell.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2002,
面頁冊數:	275 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-07, Section: A, page: 2310.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-07A.
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3099449
ISBN:	9780496470419

Consent versus controversy: Communication, conflict and the teaching of citizenship.
Dixson, Mary Campbell.

Consent versus controversy: Communication, conflict and the teaching of citizenship. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2002 - 275 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-07, Section: A, page: 2310.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Austin, 2002.

Americans crave harmony and agreement in civic life, yet conflict and argument are vital to the success of the nation. The ability to resolve civic disputes demands an informed, active, and rhetorically capable people. This study examines the extent to which conflict and controversy are included in the education of citizens. Specifically, I ask: (1) What are students' overall attitudes toward civic argumentation and conflict? (2) Are students being provided with sufficient opportunity to engage with others in profitable, if contentious, discussions? (3) Is the role of controversy in a democracy adequately represented in civics education? To answer these questions I conducted a content analysis of interaction held in high school civics courses, including student essays, classroom interactions, and textbook readings. My findings indicate that (1) textbooks provide a fairly well-rounded image of political controversy, characteristically describing it as important, inevitable, and manageable; (2) students are pragmatic in their conceptions of controversy, avoiding the emotional and ideological aspects of political conflict; (3) students evade conflict, considering it to be aberrant, destructive, and avoidable. Overall, I argue that because of their fear of becoming implicated in such a frightening political world, young citizens avoid accepting their own power and responsibility for effecting political change. Consequently, I argue that civic educators need to examine more closely how they conceive of citizenship. To help students be more prepared to take on their role as engaged citizens, civic education should increase its focus in four major areas: engagement, critical thinking, ideology, and dialogue. Ultimately to generate productive citizens, civics education must change its objective as well as its methodology.

ISBN: 9780496470419Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.

Consent versus controversy: Communication, conflict and the teaching of citizenship.
LDR:02803nmm a2200301 4500 001 2162745
005 20181009045510.5
008 190424s2002 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780496470419
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3099449
035 $a AAI3099449
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Dixson, Mary Campbell. $3 3350745
245 1 0 $a Consent versus controversy: Communication, conflict and the teaching of citizenship.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2002
300 $a 275 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-07, Section: A, page: 2310.
500 $a Supervisor: Roderick P. Hart.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Austin, 2002.
520 $a Americans crave harmony and agreement in civic life, yet conflict and argument are vital to the success of the nation. The ability to resolve civic disputes demands an informed, active, and rhetorically capable people. This study examines the extent to which conflict and controversy are included in the education of citizens. Specifically, I ask: (1) What are students' overall attitudes toward civic argumentation and conflict? (2) Are students being provided with sufficient opportunity to engage with others in profitable, if contentious, discussions? (3) Is the role of controversy in a democracy adequately represented in civics education? To answer these questions I conducted a content analysis of interaction held in high school civics courses, including student essays, classroom interactions, and textbook readings. My findings indicate that (1) textbooks provide a fairly well-rounded image of political controversy, characteristically describing it as important, inevitable, and manageable; (2) students are pragmatic in their conceptions of controversy, avoiding the emotional and ideological aspects of political conflict; (3) students evade conflict, considering it to be aberrant, destructive, and avoidable. Overall, I argue that because of their fear of becoming implicated in such a frightening political world, young citizens avoid accepting their own power and responsibility for effecting political change. Consequently, I argue that civic educators need to examine more closely how they conceive of citizenship. To help students be more prepared to take on their role as engaged citizens, civic education should increase its focus in four major areas: engagement, critical thinking, ideology, and dialogue. Ultimately to generate productive citizens, civics education must change its objective as well as its methodology.
590 $a School code: 0227.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Social sciences education. $3 2144735
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0534
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a The University of Texas at Austin. $3 718984
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-07A.
790 $a 0227
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3099449