語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
The Divergent Effects of Diversity I...
~
Martin, Ashley E.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
The Divergent Effects of Diversity Ideologies for Race and Gender Relations.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
The Divergent Effects of Diversity Ideologies for Race and Gender Relations./
作者:
Martin, Ashley E.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:
151 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
標題:
Management. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10789688
ISBN:
9780355851588
The Divergent Effects of Diversity Ideologies for Race and Gender Relations.
Martin, Ashley E.
The Divergent Effects of Diversity Ideologies for Race and Gender Relations.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 151 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2018.
Both practitioners and scholars have shown interest in initiatives that reduce bias and promote inclusion. Diversity ideologies---or beliefs and practices regarding how to approach group differences in diverse settings---have been studied as one set of strategies to promote racial equality, and argued to be effective for other intergroup relations, as well; however, little work has examined diversity ideologies in the context of gender, giving a limited understanding of their potential to improve gender relations. The present research compares the influence of two competing and commonly used ideologies--- awareness and blindness---on race and gender relations. Awareness approaches recommend acknowledging and celebrating intergroup differences, whereas blindness approaches advocate for reducing and ignoring category membership. In contrast to research suggesting that race awareness is more effective at reducing racial bias thanrace blindness, I show that the opposite is true for gender. I theorize that awareness and blindness ideologies act upon unique types of race and gender differences in ways that preserve power for the dominant group, either exposing their opportunity-limiting nature (for race) or reifying their biological functionality (for gender). Using system justification theory, I show that diversity ideologies act upon distinct system-justifying rationales, where race awareness exposes differences in opportunities and experience, lessening denial of inequality, and thereby diminishing support for the status quo. In contrast, gender awareness highlights gender roles and their biological underpinnings, legitimizing gender differences in occupational segregation, and increasing support for the status quo (Studies 1--4). Additionally, I show that diversity ideologies have implications for unique forms of opportunity outcomes for women and racial minorities. For race, by increasing recognition of societal inequities, awareness leads Whites to show more support for policies that combat systemic inequality (i.e., affirmative action). For gender, by increasing biological attributions, awareness makes men more likely to stereotype in ways that limit women's potential for success (Study 4). Finally, supporting my theory about the importance of the types of differences highlighted through awareness, I show that shifting the focus of differences toward external (opportunity, experience) ones leverages the benefits of awareness for both race and gender, providing a practical solution to improving race and gender equality (Studies 5--7). I conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for improving intergroup relations.
ISBN: 9780355851588Subjects--Topical Terms:
516664
Management.
The Divergent Effects of Diversity Ideologies for Race and Gender Relations.
LDR
:03649nmm a2200313 4500
001
2162153
005
20180927111921.5
008
190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9780355851588
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10789688
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)columbia:14564
035
$a
AAI10789688
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Martin, Ashley E.
$3
3350131
245
1 4
$a
The Divergent Effects of Diversity Ideologies for Race and Gender Relations.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2018
300
$a
151 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Katherine W. Phillips.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2018.
520
$a
Both practitioners and scholars have shown interest in initiatives that reduce bias and promote inclusion. Diversity ideologies---or beliefs and practices regarding how to approach group differences in diverse settings---have been studied as one set of strategies to promote racial equality, and argued to be effective for other intergroup relations, as well; however, little work has examined diversity ideologies in the context of gender, giving a limited understanding of their potential to improve gender relations. The present research compares the influence of two competing and commonly used ideologies--- awareness and blindness---on race and gender relations. Awareness approaches recommend acknowledging and celebrating intergroup differences, whereas blindness approaches advocate for reducing and ignoring category membership. In contrast to research suggesting that race awareness is more effective at reducing racial bias thanrace blindness, I show that the opposite is true for gender. I theorize that awareness and blindness ideologies act upon unique types of race and gender differences in ways that preserve power for the dominant group, either exposing their opportunity-limiting nature (for race) or reifying their biological functionality (for gender). Using system justification theory, I show that diversity ideologies act upon distinct system-justifying rationales, where race awareness exposes differences in opportunities and experience, lessening denial of inequality, and thereby diminishing support for the status quo. In contrast, gender awareness highlights gender roles and their biological underpinnings, legitimizing gender differences in occupational segregation, and increasing support for the status quo (Studies 1--4). Additionally, I show that diversity ideologies have implications for unique forms of opportunity outcomes for women and racial minorities. For race, by increasing recognition of societal inequities, awareness leads Whites to show more support for policies that combat systemic inequality (i.e., affirmative action). For gender, by increasing biological attributions, awareness makes men more likely to stereotype in ways that limit women's potential for success (Study 4). Finally, supporting my theory about the importance of the types of differences highlighted through awareness, I show that shifting the focus of differences toward external (opportunity, experience) ones leverages the benefits of awareness for both race and gender, providing a practical solution to improving race and gender equality (Studies 5--7). I conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for improving intergroup relations.
590
$a
School code: 0054.
650
4
$a
Management.
$3
516664
650
4
$a
Ethnic studies.
$2
bicssc
$3
1556779
650
4
$a
Gender studies.
$3
2122708
690
$a
0454
690
$a
0631
690
$a
0733
710
2
$a
Columbia University.
$b
Business.
$3
1681698
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
79-09A(E).
790
$a
0054
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2018
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10789688
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9361700
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入