東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Popular Leadership without Populism?...

Rotner, Loren Justin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Popular Leadership without Populism? A View from the Founding.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Popular Leadership without Populism? A View from the Founding./
作者:	Rotner, Loren Justin.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	278 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-01A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10615333
ISBN:	9780355215175

Popular Leadership without Populism? A View from the Founding.
Rotner, Loren Justin.

Popular Leadership without Populism? A View from the Founding. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 278 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Claremont Graduate University, 2017.

Increasingly, observers of American politics claim that we have entered a new age. Formerly, we were "democratic," "republican," or "liberal" married to a Constitution said to embody these elements; now we are simply "populist." In this dissertation, I argue that the roots of populism---and the attempts to think through the responses to populism in theory and practice---run to the foundations of the American regime. For, as I attempt to demonstrate in this dissertation, early American political theory and practice saw a dynamic and complicated working out of the tension between popular sovereignty, and its characteristic expression by popular leaders outside of institutions, and those forms thought to moderate, challenge, and elevate that voice within carefully structured constitutional institutions. From the signing of the Declaration of Independence, to the ratification of the Constitution, and into the 1790s and beyond, the ambiguity of popular sovereignty's relation to the governing order entailed sharply antagonistic modes of thinking about the characteristic problems of republicanism and the practices best calibrated to solve them. Through an interpretation of historical and primary source material, I examine some of the key thinkers and actors within America's political development from 1776--1810. I conclude by suggesting that the problem of populism was inadequately solved by the thinkers and actors of the 1790s, who point forward to the reflections on popular rhetorical leadership by Fisher Ames, John Quincy Adams and Alexis de Tocqueville.

ISBN: 9780355215175Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

Popular Leadership without Populism? A View from the Founding.
LDR:02520nmm a2200301 4500 001 2161592
005 20180917084245.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355215175
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10615333
035 $a (MiAaPQ)cgu:11106
035 $a AAI10615333
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rotner, Loren Justin. $3 3349545
245 1 0 $a Popular Leadership without Populism? A View from the Founding.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 278 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Joseph M. Bessette.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Claremont Graduate University, 2017.
520 $a Increasingly, observers of American politics claim that we have entered a new age. Formerly, we were "democratic," "republican," or "liberal" married to a Constitution said to embody these elements; now we are simply "populist." In this dissertation, I argue that the roots of populism---and the attempts to think through the responses to populism in theory and practice---run to the foundations of the American regime. For, as I attempt to demonstrate in this dissertation, early American political theory and practice saw a dynamic and complicated working out of the tension between popular sovereignty, and its characteristic expression by popular leaders outside of institutions, and those forms thought to moderate, challenge, and elevate that voice within carefully structured constitutional institutions. From the signing of the Declaration of Independence, to the ratification of the Constitution, and into the 1790s and beyond, the ambiguity of popular sovereignty's relation to the governing order entailed sharply antagonistic modes of thinking about the characteristic problems of republicanism and the practices best calibrated to solve them. Through an interpretation of historical and primary source material, I examine some of the key thinkers and actors within America's political development from 1776--1810. I conclude by suggesting that the problem of populism was inadequately solved by the thinkers and actors of the 1790s, who point forward to the reflections on popular rhetorical leadership by Fisher Ames, John Quincy Adams and Alexis de Tocqueville.
590 $a School code: 0047.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a American history. $3 2122692
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0337
710 2 $a The Claremont Graduate University. $b School of Politics and Economics. $3 1677457
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-01A(E).
790 $a 0047
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10615333