東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Genomic selection with deep neural n...

McDowell, Riley.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Genomic selection with deep neural networks.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Genomic selection with deep neural networks./
作者:	McDowell, Riley.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	49 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-03(E).
標題:	Plant sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10243302
ISBN:	9781369528244

Genomic selection with deep neural networks.
McDowell, Riley.

Genomic selection with deep neural networks. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 49 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--Iowa State University, 2016.

Reduced costs for DNA marker technology has generated a huge amount of molecular data and made it economically feasible to generate dense genome-wide marker maps of lines in a breeding program. Increased data density and volume has driven an exploration of tools and techniques to analyze these data for cultivar improvement. Data science theory and application has experienced a resurgence of research into techniques to detect or "learn" patterns in noisy data in a variety of technical applications. Several variants of machine learning have been proposed for analyzing large DNA marker data sets to aid in phenotype prediction and genomic selection. Here, we present a review of the genomic prediction and machine learning literature. We apply deep learning techniques from machine learning research to six phenotypic prediction tasks using published reference datasets. Because regularization frequently improves neural network prediction accuracy, we included regularization methods in the neural network models. The neural network models are compared to a selection of regularized Bayesian and linear regression techniques commonly employed for phenotypic prediction and genomic selection. On three of the phenotype prediction tasks, regularized neural networks were the most accurate of the models evaluated. Surprisingly, for these data sets the depth of the network architecture did not affect the accuracy of the trained model. We also find that concerns about the computer processing time needed to train neural network models to perform well in genomic prediction tasks may not apply when Graphics Processing Units are used for model training.

ISBN: 9781369528244Subjects--Topical Terms:

3173832
Plant sciences.

Genomic selection with deep neural networks.
LDR:02613nmm a2200313 4500 001 2160748
005 20180727125211.5
008 190424s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369528244
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10243302
035 $a (MiAaPQ)iastate:16108
035 $a AAI10243302
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a McDowell, Riley. $3 3348682
245 1 0 $a Genomic selection with deep neural networks.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 49 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-03.
500 $a Includes supplementary digital materials.
500 $a Advisers: David Grant; William Beavis.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Iowa State University, 2016.
520 $a Reduced costs for DNA marker technology has generated a huge amount of molecular data and made it economically feasible to generate dense genome-wide marker maps of lines in a breeding program. Increased data density and volume has driven an exploration of tools and techniques to analyze these data for cultivar improvement. Data science theory and application has experienced a resurgence of research into techniques to detect or "learn" patterns in noisy data in a variety of technical applications. Several variants of machine learning have been proposed for analyzing large DNA marker data sets to aid in phenotype prediction and genomic selection. Here, we present a review of the genomic prediction and machine learning literature. We apply deep learning techniques from machine learning research to six phenotypic prediction tasks using published reference datasets. Because regularization frequently improves neural network prediction accuracy, we included regularization methods in the neural network models. The neural network models are compared to a selection of regularized Bayesian and linear regression techniques commonly employed for phenotypic prediction and genomic selection. On three of the phenotype prediction tasks, regularized neural networks were the most accurate of the models evaluated. Surprisingly, for these data sets the depth of the network architecture did not affect the accuracy of the trained model. We also find that concerns about the computer processing time needed to train neural network models to perform well in genomic prediction tasks may not apply when Graphics Processing Units are used for model training.
590 $a School code: 0097.
650 4 $a Plant sciences. $3 3173832
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 523869
690 $a 0479
690 $a 0984
710 2 $a Iowa State University. $b Agronomy. $3 1023712
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-03(E).
790 $a 0097
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10243302