東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Culture and military effectiveness: ...

Fowler, Eric S.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Culture and military effectiveness: How societal traits influence battle outcomes.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Culture and military effectiveness: How societal traits influence battle outcomes./
作者:	Fowler, Eric S.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	263 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-10A(E).
標題:	International relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10112689
ISBN:	9781339758343

Culture and military effectiveness: How societal traits influence battle outcomes.
Fowler, Eric S.

Culture and military effectiveness: How societal traits influence battle outcomes. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 263 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Old Dominion University, 2016.

What must states do to ensure victory on the field of battle? Conventional scholarship claims that a number of material and institutional factors significantly affect a nation's ability to generate military power. Recent studies suggest that other factors, including levels of education, civil-military relations, and western culture also play an important role. This new line of logic is important because these factors tend to be glaringly absent from rigorous concepts of military power. The principle finding of this study is that culture matters and that it matters more than originally thought. Culture is admittedly complex, intangible, and difficult to count, but empirical evidence shows that culture manifests concrete effects in combat, at times determining battlefield outcomes. Culture's absence from meaningful definitions of military power results in world leaders, military commanders, and learned scholars making important political, operational, and theoretical decisions with only partial information. Put plainly, decision-makers cannot accurately assess the martial capabilities of themselves or others without accounting for culture. Consequently, national leaders likely perceive threats where none exists; ignore threats that truly matter; place great trust in incapable allies, and turn away competent help. Moreover, this ignorance of what truly matters in combat means that much of a state's potential military capability remains untapped and left to happenstance.

ISBN: 9781339758343Subjects--Topical Terms:

531762
International relations.

Culture and military effectiveness: How societal traits influence battle outcomes.
LDR:02525nmm a2200325 4500 001 2159678
005 20180703102248.5
008 190424s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339758343
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10112689
035 $a (MiAaPQ)odu:10103
035 $a AAI10112689
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fowler, Eric S. $3 3347550
245 1 0 $a Culture and military effectiveness: How societal traits influence battle outcomes.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 263 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Includes supplementary digital materials.
500 $a Adviser: Kurt Taylor Gaubatz.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Old Dominion University, 2016.
520 $a What must states do to ensure victory on the field of battle? Conventional scholarship claims that a number of material and institutional factors significantly affect a nation's ability to generate military power. Recent studies suggest that other factors, including levels of education, civil-military relations, and western culture also play an important role. This new line of logic is important because these factors tend to be glaringly absent from rigorous concepts of military power. The principle finding of this study is that culture matters and that it matters more than originally thought. Culture is admittedly complex, intangible, and difficult to count, but empirical evidence shows that culture manifests concrete effects in combat, at times determining battlefield outcomes. Culture's absence from meaningful definitions of military power results in world leaders, military commanders, and learned scholars making important political, operational, and theoretical decisions with only partial information. Put plainly, decision-makers cannot accurately assess the martial capabilities of themselves or others without accounting for culture. Consequently, national leaders likely perceive threats where none exists; ignore threats that truly matter; place great trust in incapable allies, and turn away competent help. Moreover, this ignorance of what truly matters in combat means that much of a state's potential military capability remains untapped and left to happenstance.
590 $a School code: 0418.
650 4 $a International relations. $3 531762
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
650 4 $a Cultural anthropology. $3 2122764
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0750
690 $a 0326
710 2 $a Old Dominion University. $b International Studies. $3 3281266
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-10A(E).
790 $a 0418
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10112689