東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Realdonaldtrump and Power: A Corpus...

Goldfarb, Adam.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Realdonaldtrump and Power: A Corpus and Critical Discourse Analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Realdonaldtrump and Power: A Corpus and Critical Discourse Analysis./
作者:	Goldfarb, Adam.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	59 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-04(E).
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10286797
ISBN:	9781369823721

Realdonaldtrump and Power: A Corpus and Critical Discourse Analysis.
Goldfarb, Adam.

Realdonaldtrump and Power: A Corpus and Critical Discourse Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 59 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.

Thesis (M.A.)--Hofstra University, 2017.

Social network sites (SNSs) have been attributed with playing a significant role in the three most recent presidential elections (2008, 2012, and 2016). President Trump's prolific use of Twitter was attributed as being a major factor in his successful bid for the presidency. Analyzing his Twitter feed in terms of the power vested in his language, this paper seeks to explain how Trump was able to navigate and exploit SNSs en route to the Oval Office. Through an exploration of how power is enacted through the language of RealDonaldTrump on Twitter, four factors are tested using both corpus and critical discourse analytic methods to see how exactly Trump manifests his power in social media. Pronoun choice (we versus I), semantic prosody (of Trump, Hillary, and China), stance (using John Du Boise's theory of the Stance Triangle and the pragmatic analysis of Trump's preferred hashtags), and metaphor (using critical metaphor analysis as devised by Jonathan Charteris-Black) were analyzed. Corpus software (AntConc) was used in the determination of semantic prosody and pronoun preference. The results indicate a relationship between Trump's preferred patterns of speech and the seemingly genre-advantageous nature of them.

ISBN: 9781369823721Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.

Realdonaldtrump and Power: A Corpus and Critical Discourse Analysis.
LDR:02160nmm a2200313 4500 001 2159313
005 20180628103545.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369823721
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10286797
035 $a (MiAaPQ)hofstra:10591
035 $a AAI10286797
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Goldfarb, Adam. $3 3347185
245 1 0 $a Realdonaldtrump and Power: A Corpus and Critical Discourse Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 59 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.
500 $a Adviser: Tammy A. Gales.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Hofstra University, 2017.
520 $a Social network sites (SNSs) have been attributed with playing a significant role in the three most recent presidential elections (2008, 2012, and 2016). President Trump's prolific use of Twitter was attributed as being a major factor in his successful bid for the presidency. Analyzing his Twitter feed in terms of the power vested in his language, this paper seeks to explain how Trump was able to navigate and exploit SNSs en route to the Oval Office. Through an exploration of how power is enacted through the language of RealDonaldTrump on Twitter, four factors are tested using both corpus and critical discourse analytic methods to see how exactly Trump manifests his power in social media. Pronoun choice (we versus I), semantic prosody (of Trump, Hillary, and China), stance (using John Du Boise's theory of the Stance Triangle and the pragmatic analysis of Trump's preferred hashtags), and metaphor (using critical metaphor analysis as devised by Jonathan Charteris-Black) were analyzed. Corpus software (AntConc) was used in the determination of semantic prosody and pronoun preference. The results indicate a relationship between Trump's preferred patterns of speech and the seemingly genre-advantageous nature of them.
590 $a School code: 0086.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Mass communication. $3 2144804
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0708
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a Hofstra University. $b Forensic Linguistics. $3 3289212
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-04(E).
790 $a 0086
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10286797