東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Comparison of Bias and Precision of ...

Parsley, Phillip Mark.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparison of Bias and Precision of Fin Rays, Otoliths, and Scales for Ageing Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), Brown Trout (Salmo trutta), and Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comparison of Bias and Precision of Fin Rays, Otoliths, and Scales for Ageing Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), Brown Trout (Salmo trutta), and Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis)./
作者:	Parsley, Phillip Mark.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	45 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-04(E).
標題:	Aquatic sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10254549
ISBN:	9781369760521

Comparison of Bias and Precision of Fin Rays, Otoliths, and Scales for Ageing Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), Brown Trout (Salmo trutta), and Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis).
Parsley, Phillip Mark.

Comparison of Bias and Precision of Fin Rays, Otoliths, and Scales for Ageing Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), Brown Trout (Salmo trutta), and Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis). - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 45 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.

Thesis (M.S.)--Middle Tennessee State University, 2017.

The precision, bias, and accuracy of age estimates from scales, pelvic fin rays, and otoliths were compared for Brook Trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis), Brown Trout (Salmo trutta), and Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis). Calcified structures were collected for each fish and age estimates were obtained by counting the number of annuli by two independent readers. The precision of age estimates was estimated by coefficient of variation (CV), and percent agreement (PA) between readers. Bias and accuracy were investigated through analysis of age-bias plots and Wilcoxon matched pairs rank tests. In all analyses, age estimates of Brook Trout, Brown Trout and the Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout were most precise using otoliths and fin rays. Typically, age estimates of otoliths and fin rays were more accurate than scales particularly for age classes > 4. Age estimates with scales typically underestimated the age of older fish whereas age estimates of fin rays and otoliths were closer in agreement. The differences of age estimates from fin rays, otoliths, and scales found in this study emphasize the importance of validating calcified structures for these species. Additionally, the accuracy and precision of age estimates from fin rays demonstrate that this method is a viable nonlethal alternative to the lethal sampling required for obtaining otoliths.

ISBN: 9781369760521Subjects--Topical Terms:

3174300
Aquatic sciences.

Comparison of Bias and Precision of Fin Rays, Otoliths, and Scales for Ageing Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), Brown Trout (Salmo trutta), and Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis).
LDR:02440nmm a2200301 4500 001 2158671
005 20180618102523.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369760521
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10254549
035 $a (MiAaPQ)mtsu:10746
035 $a AAI10254549
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Parsley, Phillip Mark. $3 3346502
245 1 0 $a Comparison of Bias and Precision of Fin Rays, Otoliths, and Scales for Ageing Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), Brown Trout (Salmo trutta), and Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis).
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 45 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.
500 $a Adviser: Sarah E. Bergemann.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Middle Tennessee State University, 2017.
520 $a The precision, bias, and accuracy of age estimates from scales, pelvic fin rays, and otoliths were compared for Brook Trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis), Brown Trout (Salmo trutta), and Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis). Calcified structures were collected for each fish and age estimates were obtained by counting the number of annuli by two independent readers. The precision of age estimates was estimated by coefficient of variation (CV), and percent agreement (PA) between readers. Bias and accuracy were investigated through analysis of age-bias plots and Wilcoxon matched pairs rank tests. In all analyses, age estimates of Brook Trout, Brown Trout and the Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout were most precise using otoliths and fin rays. Typically, age estimates of otoliths and fin rays were more accurate than scales particularly for age classes > 4. Age estimates with scales typically underestimated the age of older fish whereas age estimates of fin rays and otoliths were closer in agreement. The differences of age estimates from fin rays, otoliths, and scales found in this study emphasize the importance of validating calcified structures for these species. Additionally, the accuracy and precision of age estimates from fin rays demonstrate that this method is a viable nonlethal alternative to the lethal sampling required for obtaining otoliths.
590 $a School code: 0170.
650 4 $a Aquatic sciences. $3 3174300
650 4 $a Zoology. $3 518878
690 $a 0792
690 $a 0472
710 2 $a Middle Tennessee State University. $b Biology. $3 3181221
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-04(E).
790 $a 0170
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10254549