東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Determinant of US Consumers Atti...

Lu, Chao-Lin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Determinant of US Consumers Attitudes Toward Solar Energy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Determinant of US Consumers Attitudes Toward Solar Energy./
作者:	Lu, Chao-Lin.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	128 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-01A(E).
標題:	Environmental education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10646408
ISBN:	9780355196603

The Determinant of US Consumers Attitudes Toward Solar Energy.
Lu, Chao-Lin.

The Determinant of US Consumers Attitudes Toward Solar Energy. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 128 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2016.

Solar energy provides several significant advantages, such as reduction of the CO2 emissions, increase of energy supply diversification, security of energy, and regional/national energy independence. Due to the reduced installation cost and the rapid advances in solar energy technology, the installed capacity of solar power has been increasing over time in the United States. Nevertheless, the solar energy capacity and policies differ significantly across the states. Thus, determining the consumers' preferences for solar energy and policies is critical for future solar energy policy development.

ISBN: 9780355196603Subjects--Topical Terms:

528212
Environmental education.

The Determinant of US Consumers Attitudes Toward Solar Energy.
LDR:02507nmm a2200313 4500 001 2158610
005 20180614071649.5
008 190424s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355196603
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10646408
035 $a AAI10646408
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lu, Chao-Lin. $3 3346438
245 1 4 $a The Determinant of US Consumers Attitudes Toward Solar Energy.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 128 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Zhifeng Gao.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2016.
520 $a Solar energy provides several significant advantages, such as reduction of the CO2 emissions, increase of energy supply diversification, security of energy, and regional/national energy independence. Due to the reduced installation cost and the rapid advances in solar energy technology, the installed capacity of solar power has been increasing over time in the United States. Nevertheless, the solar energy capacity and policies differ significantly across the states. Thus, determining the consumers' preferences for solar energy and policies is critical for future solar energy policy development.
520 $a In this study, we used the stated preference methods to elicit consumer preference for solar energy and determine the impact of solar energy policy on consumers' support of solar energy. Our results show that consumers' mean WTP was $24.110 per month for ITC, 2.5 times higher than rebate programs (i.e. $9.631) and 4 times higher than production incentives (i.e. $6.889). Consumers' mean WTP for property tax incentives ($24.691 per month) was 2.8 times higher than net metering (i.e. $8.804) and 1.16 times higher than sales tax incentives (i.e. $21.197). The fact that ITC and property tax incentives have high WTP values indicates that the respondents prefer to accept direct subsidy when they install the solar energy system. The results of the study could facilitate the development of the solar policy instruments that can more effectively encourage the solar energy adoption and extend the public understanding of the environmental and economic aspects of solar energy.
590 $a School code: 0070.
650 4 $a Environmental education. $3 528212
650 4 $a Alternative Energy. $3 1035473
650 4 $a Energy. $3 876794
690 $a 0442
690 $a 0363
690 $a 0791
710 2 $a University of Florida. $b Food and Resource Economics. $3 3346439
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-01A(E).
790 $a 0070
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10646408