東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

What's the Draw: Illustrating the Im...

Osinski, Brianna.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

What's the Draw: Illustrating the Impacts of Cartoons Versus Photographs on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions for Wildlife Conservation.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	What's the Draw: Illustrating the Impacts of Cartoons Versus Photographs on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions for Wildlife Conservation./
Author:	Osinski, Brianna.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
Description:	87 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-01(E).
Subject:	Conservation biology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10607652
ISBN:	9780355266047

What's the Draw: Illustrating the Impacts of Cartoons Versus Photographs on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions for Wildlife Conservation.
Osinski, Brianna.

What's the Draw: Illustrating the Impacts of Cartoons Versus Photographs on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions for Wildlife Conservation. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 87 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-01.

Thesis (M.S.)--Purdue University, 2017.

Creating cartoon caricatures of animals is a common, yet rarely tested, tactic for increasing wildlife conservation support. Indiana adults were surveyed to investigate if cartoons of non-charismatic wildlife (i.e., fanshell mussels (Cyprogenia stegaria), eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus a. alleganiensis), and northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis )) elicited more positive attitudes and behavioral intentions than photographs. Additionally, Indiana wildlife management professionals (WMPs) were interviewed about the use of cartoons for conservation. The cartoon's effects differed between species, attitude type ("Likeability" and "Worth"), and behavioral intentions. Compared to photograph scores, the cartoon "Likeability" scores were less positive for mussels, more positive for hellbenders, and not significantly different for bats. Depiction had no significant impact on "Worth" or behavioral intentions. However, both attitudes predicted significantly more positive behavioral intentions. WMPs were open to creating cartoons of non-charismatic species for conservation if the cartoon was accurate, connected with a broad audience, and had a clear message. These data illustrate the potential of cartoons as effective tools in non-charismatic species conservation.

ISBN: 9780355266047Subjects--Topical Terms:

535736
Conservation biology.

What's the Draw: Illustrating the Impacts of Cartoons Versus Photographs on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions for Wildlife Conservation.
LDR:02317nmm a2200325 4500 001 2155640
005 20180511093033.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355266047
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10607652
035 $a (MiAaPQ)purdue:21743
035 $a AAI10607652
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Osinski, Brianna. $3 3343376
245 1 0 $a What's the Draw: Illustrating the Impacts of Cartoons Versus Photographs on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions for Wildlife Conservation.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 87 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-01.
500 $a Advisers: Rod Williams; Linda Prokopy.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Purdue University, 2017.
520 $a Creating cartoon caricatures of animals is a common, yet rarely tested, tactic for increasing wildlife conservation support. Indiana adults were surveyed to investigate if cartoons of non-charismatic wildlife (i.e., fanshell mussels (Cyprogenia stegaria), eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus a. alleganiensis), and northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis )) elicited more positive attitudes and behavioral intentions than photographs. Additionally, Indiana wildlife management professionals (WMPs) were interviewed about the use of cartoons for conservation. The cartoon's effects differed between species, attitude type ("Likeability" and "Worth"), and behavioral intentions. Compared to photograph scores, the cartoon "Likeability" scores were less positive for mussels, more positive for hellbenders, and not significantly different for bats. Depiction had no significant impact on "Worth" or behavioral intentions. However, both attitudes predicted significantly more positive behavioral intentions. WMPs were open to creating cartoons of non-charismatic species for conservation if the cartoon was accurate, connected with a broad audience, and had a clear message. These data illustrate the potential of cartoons as effective tools in non-charismatic species conservation.
590 $a School code: 0183.
650 4 $a Conservation biology. $3 535736
650 4 $a Social research. $3 2122687
650 4 $a Marketing. $3 536353
650 4 $a Wildlife conservation. $2 fast $3 542165
690 $a 0408
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0338
690 $a 0284
710 2 $a Purdue University. $b Forestry and Natural Resources. $3 2093037
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-01(E).
790 $a 0183
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10607652