東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

A comparison of different methods of...

Fleischer, Michael.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A comparison of different methods of detecting inattentive responding on self-report personality measures.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A comparison of different methods of detecting inattentive responding on self-report personality measures./
Author:	Fleischer, Michael.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	101 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-11B(E).
Subject:	Personality psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10133694
ISBN:	9781339922690

A comparison of different methods of detecting inattentive responding on self-report personality measures.
Fleischer, Michael.

A comparison of different methods of detecting inattentive responding on self-report personality measures. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 101 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Illinois Institute of Technology, 2016.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

The goal of this study was to identify the best indices for detecting inattentive respondents. This was accomplished by collecting data from respondents who were attentive and inattentive. Five different methods for detecting inattention were compared to determine which of these methods were the most effective. The indices used for detecting inattention were: instructional items, nonsensical items, Fleischer type items, total time, and psychometric consistency. These were classified into two types item based indices and non-item based indices. It was hypothesized and found that Fleischer items were viewed as less awed or out of place when compared to nonsensical and instructional item types. Additional hypotheses tested the effectiveness of each the indices and supported the hypothesis, in finding the Fleischer type and total time to be the best identifiers of inattentive respondents. The final hypothesis did not find support that removing inattentive respondents would yield only better reliabilities. The results were mixed and the interpretation of this and the other findings results are discussed in detail in the following paper.

ISBN: 9781339922690Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144789
Personality psychology.

A comparison of different methods of detecting inattentive responding on self-report personality measures.
LDR:02232nmm a2200325 4500 001 2155255
005 20180426091041.5
008 190424s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339922690
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10133694
035 $a (MiAaPQ)iit:10308
035 $a AAI10133694
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fleischer, Michael. $3 3342996
245 1 2 $a A comparison of different methods of detecting inattentive responding on self-report personality measures.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 101 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Scott Morris.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Illinois Institute of Technology, 2016.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
520 $a The goal of this study was to identify the best indices for detecting inattentive respondents. This was accomplished by collecting data from respondents who were attentive and inattentive. Five different methods for detecting inattention were compared to determine which of these methods were the most effective. The indices used for detecting inattention were: instructional items, nonsensical items, Fleischer type items, total time, and psychometric consistency. These were classified into two types item based indices and non-item based indices. It was hypothesized and found that Fleischer items were viewed as less awed or out of place when compared to nonsensical and instructional item types. Additional hypotheses tested the effectiveness of each the indices and supported the hypothesis, in finding the Fleischer type and total time to be the best identifiers of inattentive respondents. The final hypothesis did not find support that removing inattentive respondents would yield only better reliabilities. The results were mixed and the interpretation of this and the other findings results are discussed in detail in the following paper.
590 $a School code: 0091.
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 2144789
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a Illinois Institute of Technology. $b Psychology. $3 3182307
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-11B(E).
790 $a 0091
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10133694