東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The Three Rs of Online Learning: Int...

Wilton, Lesley.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Three Rs of Online Learning: Interpretive Views of the Social Practices of Reading, Rereading, and Revisiting.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Three Rs of Online Learning: Interpretive Views of the Social Practices of Reading, Rereading, and Revisiting./
Author:	Wilton, Lesley.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
Description:	299 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-04A(E).
Subject:	Educational technology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10261004
ISBN:	9780355456875

The Three Rs of Online Learning: Interpretive Views of the Social Practices of Reading, Rereading, and Revisiting.
Wilton, Lesley.

The Three Rs of Online Learning: Interpretive Views of the Social Practices of Reading, Rereading, and Revisiting. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 299 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2017.

As participation in formal online learning continues to be more commonplace in higher education, high schools, and middle schools (Means, Toyama, Murphy, Bakia, & Jones, 2010), contextualized explorations of social practices important to learning in discussion-based online learning environments (DBOLEs) are called for. This research combines both online learning and literacy research perspectives by examining quantitative and qualitative data from an interpretive perspective to better understand the less visible, less studied, and typically less instructor-valued practices of reading, rereading, and revisiting (the 3 Rs) in DBOLEs. This study of the behaviours and opinions of 137 students, one instructor, and their 13,754 entries in eight online graduate education courses investigates the social practices of the 3Rs and those practices related to subject titles. Revisiting others' word-for-word ideas and creating/selecting information by subject titles are new literacy practices taking place in online learning that ordinarily do not have identical practices in face-to-face classrooms. These practices are essential to online learning and are important to understand. An instructor interview contributed thoughtful perspectives while documenting understandings of how learners' social practices can be supported and valued. Through an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, the findings are presented in three sub-study formats.

ISBN: 9780355456875Subjects--Topical Terms:

517670
Educational technology.

The Three Rs of Online Learning: Interpretive Views of the Social Practices of Reading, Rereading, and Revisiting.
LDR:03515nmm a2200337 4500 001 2154893
005 20180426101948.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355456875
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10261004
035 $a (MiAaPQ)toronto:15490
035 $a AAI10261004
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wilton, Lesley. $3 3342631
245 1 4 $a The Three Rs of Online Learning: Interpretive Views of the Social Practices of Reading, Rereading, and Revisiting.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 299 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Clare Brett.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2017.
520 $a As participation in formal online learning continues to be more commonplace in higher education, high schools, and middle schools (Means, Toyama, Murphy, Bakia, & Jones, 2010), contextualized explorations of social practices important to learning in discussion-based online learning environments (DBOLEs) are called for. This research combines both online learning and literacy research perspectives by examining quantitative and qualitative data from an interpretive perspective to better understand the less visible, less studied, and typically less instructor-valued practices of reading, rereading, and revisiting (the 3 Rs) in DBOLEs. This study of the behaviours and opinions of 137 students, one instructor, and their 13,754 entries in eight online graduate education courses investigates the social practices of the 3Rs and those practices related to subject titles. Revisiting others' word-for-word ideas and creating/selecting information by subject titles are new literacy practices taking place in online learning that ordinarily do not have identical practices in face-to-face classrooms. These practices are essential to online learning and are important to understand. An instructor interview contributed thoughtful perspectives while documenting understandings of how learners' social practices can be supported and valued. Through an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, the findings are presented in three sub-study formats.
520 $a This study finds that participants revisit many entries, sometimes multiple times, to further their understandings or seek clarification, or participate socially in the online learning environment. As well, the findings suggest that creating subject titles is an important practice that influences the learning of both the author and the reader. These findings call for consideration of a pedagogical change in the value placed on these less visible practices, supported by instructional design modifications highlighting, for both instructors and students, the importance of reading and revisiting activities.
520 $a Finally, it may be valuable to consider more deeply exploring and documenting the social practices taking place in online learning in order to contribute to a potential lowercase theory of new literacies in online learning, under the wings of the evolving uppercase Dual-Level Theory of New Literacies (Leu, Kinzer, Coiro, Castek, & Henry, 2013). This research could be considered a contributing body of work.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0456
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $b Curriculum, Teaching and Learning. $3 2095033
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-04A(E).
790 $a 0779
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10261004