東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Framing Responsibility for Bullying:...

Knight, Kayla.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Framing Responsibility for Bullying: An Ethnographic Content Analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Framing Responsibility for Bullying: An Ethnographic Content Analysis./
作者:	Knight, Kayla.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	65 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International54-04(E).
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1586807
ISBN:	9781321693232

Framing Responsibility for Bullying: An Ethnographic Content Analysis.
Knight, Kayla.

Framing Responsibility for Bullying: An Ethnographic Content Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 65 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-04.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Arkansas, 2015.

The purpose of the current study is to explore ways in which American print news media frame responsibility for adolescent and teen bullying. More specifically, how media portray responsibility for the underlying causes and consequences of bullying, as well as for responding to bullying, are examined. Drawing from media studies and the construction of social problems literature, the study is guided by two broad research questions, 1) How do American news media frame responsibility for bullying? and 2) What news sources, or "claims-makers," are selected as authorities on bullying in news media articles? Articles published between 2009 and 2013 are collected through the LexisNexis news index based on several search words relevant to bullying. An ethnographic content analysis (ECA) of these articles is then conducted to better understand how news media package responsibility for bullying through the use of frames, emerging themes, and the inclusion of selected claims-makers. This study finds that schools are framed as primarily responsible for bullying, while families and individuals involved in bullying are framed as less responsible. Findings also suggest that news media coverage of bullying is more likely to center on responsibility in regards to needed responses to bullying, such as through raising public awareness, as opposed to addressing the underlying causes and consequences. Importantly, articles that did discuss the causes of bullying tended to place blame on advances in technology and victims' sexual orientations and gender identities. The implications of key findings for policy and future research are discussed.

ISBN: 9781321693232Subjects--Topical Terms:

532803
Public policy.

Framing Responsibility for Bullying: An Ethnographic Content Analysis.
LDR:02562nmm a2200313 4500 001 2127913
005 20180105074625.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321693232
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1586807
035 $a AAI1586807
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Knight, Kayla. $3 3290085
245 1 0 $a Framing Responsibility for Bullying: An Ethnographic Content Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 65 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-04.
500 $a Adviser: Jeff Gruenewald.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Arkansas, 2015.
520 $a The purpose of the current study is to explore ways in which American print news media frame responsibility for adolescent and teen bullying. More specifically, how media portray responsibility for the underlying causes and consequences of bullying, as well as for responding to bullying, are examined. Drawing from media studies and the construction of social problems literature, the study is guided by two broad research questions, 1) How do American news media frame responsibility for bullying? and 2) What news sources, or "claims-makers," are selected as authorities on bullying in news media articles? Articles published between 2009 and 2013 are collected through the LexisNexis news index based on several search words relevant to bullying. An ethnographic content analysis (ECA) of these articles is then conducted to better understand how news media package responsibility for bullying through the use of frames, emerging themes, and the inclusion of selected claims-makers. This study finds that schools are framed as primarily responsible for bullying, while families and individuals involved in bullying are framed as less responsible. Findings also suggest that news media coverage of bullying is more likely to center on responsibility in regards to needed responses to bullying, such as through raising public awareness, as opposed to addressing the underlying causes and consequences. Importantly, articles that did discuss the causes of bullying tended to place blame on advances in technology and victims' sexual orientations and gender identities. The implications of key findings for policy and future research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0011.
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Social research. $3 2122687
650 4 $a Mass communication. $3 2144804
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0708
690 $a 0622
710 2 $a University of Arkansas. $b Sociology. $3 2091904
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 54-04(E).
790 $a 0011
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1586807