東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Effect of Response Format and Pr...

Walker, Ronda.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effect of Response Format and Presentation Conditions on Comprehension Assessments for Students with and without a Reading Disability.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effect of Response Format and Presentation Conditions on Comprehension Assessments for Students with and without a Reading Disability./
作者:	Walker, Ronda.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	62 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-01B(E).
標題:	Speech therapy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10601892
ISBN:	9780355214727

The Effect of Response Format and Presentation Conditions on Comprehension Assessments for Students with and without a Reading Disability.
Walker, Ronda.

The Effect of Response Format and Presentation Conditions on Comprehension Assessments for Students with and without a Reading Disability. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 62 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2017.

Previous studies (Collins, 2015; Kennan & Meenan, 2014) have shown how variations in text and task factors and individual reader skills affect performance on reading comprehension assessments. The present study examined whether different presentation conditions (silent reading, watching a video) and response formats (open-ended vs. multiple-choice questions) influenced comprehension performance for students with and without reading disabilities. In addition, measures of word-level reading, vocabulary, working memory, listening comprehension, and prior knowledge were also assessed to determine the best predictors of performance on comprehension assessments.

ISBN: 9780355214727Subjects--Topical Terms:

520446
Speech therapy.

The Effect of Response Format and Presentation Conditions on Comprehension Assessments for Students with and without a Reading Disability.
LDR:03460nmm a2200337 4500 001 2127732
005 20180105074619.5
008 180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355214727
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10601892
035 $a AAI10601892
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Walker, Ronda. $3 3289901
245 1 4 $a The Effect of Response Format and Presentation Conditions on Comprehension Assessments for Students with and without a Reading Disability.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 62 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Alan Kamhi.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2017.
520 $a Previous studies (Collins, 2015; Kennan & Meenan, 2014) have shown how variations in text and task factors and individual reader skills affect performance on reading comprehension assessments. The present study examined whether different presentation conditions (silent reading, watching a video) and response formats (open-ended vs. multiple-choice questions) influenced comprehension performance for students with and without reading disabilities. In addition, measures of word-level reading, vocabulary, working memory, listening comprehension, and prior knowledge were also assessed to determine the best predictors of performance on comprehension assessments.
520 $a Participants were 32 fifth grade students, 17 with reading disabilities (RD) and 15 typically developing (TD) students. All students were initially administered measures of word-level reading, vocabulary, listening comprehension, working memory, and decoding. Students were then administered four passages. Two of the passages were read silently and two were presented with videos. For each condition (text and video), comprehension was assessed with open-ended and multiple-choice questions. All assessments were administered individually to each student across two 60-minute testing sessions.
520 $a All students were found to perform significantly better on the multiple-choice questions than the open-ended questions. As expected, the TD group had significantly higher comprehension scores on all measures. Presentation condition did not significantly affect performance for either group. Listening comprehension, working memory, and prior knowledge contributed unique variance to performance on the different response formats. For the open-ended questions, 67% of the variance was explained by the measures of listening comprehension and prior knowledge. In contrast, only 38% of the variance was explained by working memory for the multiple-choice questions.
520 $a Even though students performed better on the multiple-choice questions, the regression analyses indicated that the open-ended questions were better reflections of basic language abilities and prior knowledge. Open-ended questions appear to provide a better measure of reader and text factors than multiple-choice questions which are more influenced by task factors. Future studies should continue to examine how reader, text and task factors influence comprehension performance.
590 $a School code: 0154.
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
690 $a 0460
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0524
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. $b Health and Human Sciences: Communication Sciences and Disorders. $3 3289902
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-01B(E).
790 $a 0154
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10601892