東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Decision Making of Environmental Eng...

Davis, Millicent A.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Decision Making of Environmental Engineers on Project Selection.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Decision Making of Environmental Engineers on Project Selection./
Author:	Davis, Millicent A.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	174 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-03A(E).
Subject:	Business administration. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10170222
ISBN:	9781369243338

Decision Making of Environmental Engineers on Project Selection.
Davis, Millicent A.

Decision Making of Environmental Engineers on Project Selection. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 174 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (D.B.A.)--Walden University, 2016.

Some environmental engineers do not understand how to perceive profitable opportunities in redeveloping the large number of contaminated brownfield sites in New Jersey. The purpose of this qualitative exploratory case study was to find effective decision-making strategies that help environmental engineers acquire profitable environmental redevelopment projects. The target population consisted of 4 environmental engineers in an environmental organization in Camden County, New Jersey who possessed proven decision-making strategies that helped them acquire profitable environmental redevelopment projects in the past 5 years. The conceptual framework for this study was the multiple criteria decision method (MCDM). Semistructured interviews were conducted with the engineers, and company documents were additional sources of data gathered. Triangulation and member checking were used to ensure the trustworthiness of interpretations. Five themes emerged from the analyses relating to strategies for an MCDM assessment in project management, a go/no--go assessment in project selections, education and training, ethics as an organizational value, and project management. These findings may lead to social change in Camden County, New Jersey community organizations, such as schools, daycare centers, and local businesses, which may benefit from the knowledge and safety recommendations of remediation decision making. Furthermore, these findings may provide opportunities for environment organizations to teach and train stakeholders on environmental processes while providing profitable opportunities to shareholders through sustainable practices.

ISBN: 9781369243338Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168311
Business administration.

Decision Making of Environmental Engineers on Project Selection.
LDR:02563nmm a2200301 4500 001 2125135
005 20171113075159.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369243338
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10170222
035 $a AAI10170222
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Davis, Millicent A. $3 3287183
245 1 0 $a Decision Making of Environmental Engineers on Project Selection.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 174 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jill Murray.
502 $a Thesis (D.B.A.)--Walden University, 2016.
520 $a Some environmental engineers do not understand how to perceive profitable opportunities in redeveloping the large number of contaminated brownfield sites in New Jersey. The purpose of this qualitative exploratory case study was to find effective decision-making strategies that help environmental engineers acquire profitable environmental redevelopment projects. The target population consisted of 4 environmental engineers in an environmental organization in Camden County, New Jersey who possessed proven decision-making strategies that helped them acquire profitable environmental redevelopment projects in the past 5 years. The conceptual framework for this study was the multiple criteria decision method (MCDM). Semistructured interviews were conducted with the engineers, and company documents were additional sources of data gathered. Triangulation and member checking were used to ensure the trustworthiness of interpretations. Five themes emerged from the analyses relating to strategies for an MCDM assessment in project management, a go/no--go assessment in project selections, education and training, ethics as an organizational value, and project management. These findings may lead to social change in Camden County, New Jersey community organizations, such as schools, daycare centers, and local businesses, which may benefit from the knowledge and safety recommendations of remediation decision making. Furthermore, these findings may provide opportunities for environment organizations to teach and train stakeholders on environmental processes while providing profitable opportunities to shareholders through sustainable practices.
590 $a School code: 0543.
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 3168311
650 4 $a Environmental engineering. $3 548583
650 4 $a Environmental management. $3 535182
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0775
690 $a 0474
710 2 $a Walden University. $b Business Administration. $3 2099452
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-03A(E).
790 $a 0543
791 $a D.B.A.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10170222