東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Consumers' Communication Channels Pr...

Rondon Diplan, Carolina.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Consumers' Communication Channels Preferences: High-Stake Versus Low-Stake Brands.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Consumers' Communication Channels Preferences: High-Stake Versus Low-Stake Brands./
作者:	Rondon Diplan, Carolina.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	54 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-03(E).
標題:	Mass communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1605955
ISBN:	9781339352695

Consumers' Communication Channels Preferences: High-Stake Versus Low-Stake Brands.
Rondon Diplan, Carolina.

Consumers' Communication Channels Preferences: High-Stake Versus Low-Stake Brands. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 54 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--Rochester Institute of Technology, 2015.

The purpose of this study was to explore which communication channels consumers are more likely to use when they want to provide feedback or acquire information about high-stake and low-stake brands. This research relies on the results of a survey and an analysis of the literature to gather findings. Results suggest that consumers prefer to talk more about high-stake brands than low-stake brands. They also show that consumers are more inclined to use face-to-face, Facebook, and websites to communicate experiences and acquire information about brands than other evaluated communication channels. Finally, consumers are more likely to express negative experiences than positive experiences or questions. Findings of this research provide insights to enhance the consumer-brand interactions in brand communications.

ISBN: 9781339352695Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144804
Mass communication.

Consumers' Communication Channels Preferences: High-Stake Versus Low-Stake Brands.
LDR:01737nmm a2200289 4500 001 2123678
005 20171003070923.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339352695
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1605955
035 $a AAI1605955
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rondon Diplan, Carolina. $3 3285611
245 1 0 $a Consumers' Communication Channels Preferences: High-Stake Versus Low-Stake Brands.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 54 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-03.
500 $a Advisers: David Neumann; Adriana Boveda-Lambie.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Rochester Institute of Technology, 2015.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to explore which communication channels consumers are more likely to use when they want to provide feedback or acquire information about high-stake and low-stake brands. This research relies on the results of a survey and an analysis of the literature to gather findings. Results suggest that consumers prefer to talk more about high-stake brands than low-stake brands. They also show that consumers are more inclined to use face-to-face, Facebook, and websites to communicate experiences and acquire information about brands than other evaluated communication channels. Finally, consumers are more likely to express negative experiences than positive experiences or questions. Findings of this research provide insights to enhance the consumer-brand interactions in brand communications.
590 $a School code: 0465.
650 4 $a Mass communication. $3 2144804
650 4 $a Marketing. $3 536353
690 $a 0708
690 $a 0338
710 2 $a Rochester Institute of Technology. $b Communication and Media Technologies. $3 1037381
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-03(E).
790 $a 0465
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1605955