東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Anti-China rhetoric, presidential el...

Fang, Xiaodong.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Anti-China rhetoric, presidential elections and U.S. foreign policy towards China.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Anti-China rhetoric, presidential elections and U.S. foreign policy towards China./
作者:	Fang, Xiaodong.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	162 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-10A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10128065
ISBN:	9781339860978

Anti-China rhetoric, presidential elections and U.S. foreign policy towards China.
Fang, Xiaodong.

Anti-China rhetoric, presidential elections and U.S. foreign policy towards China. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 162 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2016.

Is anti-China rhetoric an effective strategy in U.S. presidential campaigns? If the answer is Yes, then to what extent does anti-China rhetoric affect them? If the answer is No, then why have so many presidential candidates used anti-China rhetoric in recent campaigns? Is anti-China rhetoric only election-driven? Is it also policy-driven? Do presidential candidates use anti-China rhetoric to seek voter support, as well as propose changes in U.S. foreign policy towards China?

ISBN: 9781339860978Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

Anti-China rhetoric, presidential elections and U.S. foreign policy towards China.
LDR:03296nmm a2200313 4500 001 2122416
005 20170922124913.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339860978
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10128065
035 $a AAI10128065
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fang, Xiaodong. $3 3284387
245 1 0 $a Anti-China rhetoric, presidential elections and U.S. foreign policy towards China.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 162 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Stephen J. Wayne.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2016.
520 $a Is anti-China rhetoric an effective strategy in U.S. presidential campaigns? If the answer is Yes, then to what extent does anti-China rhetoric affect them? If the answer is No, then why have so many presidential candidates used anti-China rhetoric in recent campaigns? Is anti-China rhetoric only election-driven? Is it also policy-driven? Do presidential candidates use anti-China rhetoric to seek voter support, as well as propose changes in U.S. foreign policy towards China?
520 $a Conventional wisdom and scholars like Robert Sutter suggest that foreign policy has little effect on American presidential elections and anti-foreign rhetoric by presidential candidates does not matter to American foreign policy and foreign relations. In this dissertation, however, I argue the opposite that anti-China rhetoric exercises significant influence on American presidential elections and foreign policy towards China. The dissertation addresses two fundamental questions: 1) what is the effect of anti-China rhetoric on American presidential elections? And 2) what is the effect of anti-China rhetoric on American foreign policy towards China, American public opinion towards China, and U.S.-China relationship? To answer the first question about elections, I focus on televised campaign commercials and statistically estimate the effect of anti-China rhetoric on seeking voter support in the presidential election. The data I examine come from the "Wisconsin Advertising Project" and various election polls in 2008. I answer the second question about foreign policy by exploring the contents of anti-China rhetoric in campaign activities including ads, candidates' speeches and debates, and public statements about policy towards China and how that rhetoric affects subsequent American foreign policy towards China, as well as public opinion of China and U.S.-China relations. My statistical and qualitative analyses find that airing ads using anti-China rhetoric increases the presidential candidate's voter support in target states; that the administration is more likely to make tough foreign policies towards China when there is more anti-China rhetoric by presidential candidates; and thirdly, that anti-China rhetoric during the election year negatively affects American opinions of China but produces a positive impact on U.S.-China relations.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a American studies. $3 2122720
650 4 $a International relations. $3 531762
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0323
690 $a 0601
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Government. $3 1043944
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-10A(E).
790 $a 0076
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10128065