東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Using audio screencast for feedback ...

Cunningham, Marcelene Allecia.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Using audio screencast for feedback on short written essays.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Using audio screencast for feedback on short written essays./
Author:	Cunningham, Marcelene Allecia.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
Description:	103 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-03A(E).
Subject:	Rhetoric. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3733157
ISBN:	9781339213217

Using audio screencast for feedback on short written essays.
Cunningham, Marcelene Allecia.

Using audio screencast for feedback on short written essays. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 103 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2015.

Although feedback on writing is researched in the disciplinary context of teaching writing, little research investigates feedback on short-form essay writing. The field of instructional design is also lacking in research on feedback in the teaching of writing. However, research in the field of multimedia learning including the personalization principle (Mayer, 2001) would seem to support providing conversational audio as an alternative to providing written corrective feedback to students who are engaged in the writing process. Even though the field of Rhetoric and Composition and Instructional Design does not offer much research on feedback on short-form writing, the most substantial research base comes from the field of English as a Second Language (ESL).

ISBN: 9781339213217Subjects--Topical Terms:

516647
Rhetoric.

Using audio screencast for feedback on short written essays.
LDR:03962nmm a2200361 4500 001 2122356
005 20170912094022.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339213217
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3733157
035 $a AAI3733157
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Cunningham, Marcelene Allecia. $3 3284323
245 1 0 $a Using audio screencast for feedback on short written essays.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 103 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Peter J. Fadde.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2015.
520 $a Although feedback on writing is researched in the disciplinary context of teaching writing, little research investigates feedback on short-form essay writing. The field of instructional design is also lacking in research on feedback in the teaching of writing. However, research in the field of multimedia learning including the personalization principle (Mayer, 2001) would seem to support providing conversational audio as an alternative to providing written corrective feedback to students who are engaged in the writing process. Even though the field of Rhetoric and Composition and Instructional Design does not offer much research on feedback on short-form writing, the most substantial research base comes from the field of English as a Second Language (ESL).
520 $a The purpose of this study was two-fold. Firstly, the study explored pre-medical students' perceptions, and achievement on the types of feedback received on their writing assignments. Secondly, the study examined the types of feedback an instructor is more likely to give in the different formats of traditional written versus audio screencast formats.
520 $a The participants for this study included 1 instructor, who was a subject of analysis, and 31 pre-medical students at a Midwestern university. The study was categorized into three strands. Strand 1 utilized a survey design, Strand 2 utilized a repeated-measure design, and Strand 3 utilized a content analysis design to address the research questions. In Strand 1, the open-ended questions revealed that students liked the feedback via audio screencast as being more personal, but also found written corrective feedback more specific. In addition, a combined feedback approach was evident from the closed-ended questions. In Strand 2, data analysis revealed statistically significant increase in all the students' essay scores except for assignments 1 and 5, in which the traditional written format was utilized.
520 $a In Strand 3, data analysis revealed that a significantly more direct and indirect corrective feedback comments were given by the instructor on essays when utilizing the traditional written feedback format compared to when feedback via audio screencast was used. Data analysis also revealed that the instructor had a substantially higher usage of rhetorical and social supportive feedback when providing feedback via audio screencast as opposed to the traditional written feedback format.
520 $a The study contributes to the existing body of literature on audio feedback and written feedback on writing assignments in ESL, and serves as a foundation for writing teachers who are interested in writing in general and feedback on writing assignments. The study suggests that instructional designers can use the findings of this study to guide and inform their decisions about innovative approaches to providing feedback on students writing, which is a vehicle for critical thinking, and synthesis in many content areas.
590 $a School code: 0209.
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0441
710 2 $a Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. $b Curriculum and Instruction. $3 1018013
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-03A(E).
790 $a 0209
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3733157