東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Literacy as social practice: Using i...

Latona, Susan A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Literacy as social practice: Using inquiry-based methods with marginalized learners.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Literacy as social practice: Using inquiry-based methods with marginalized learners./
作者:	Latona, Susan A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	290 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-07A(E).
標題:	Curriculum development. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10013541
ISBN:	9781339480879

Literacy as social practice: Using inquiry-based methods with marginalized learners.
Latona, Susan A.

Literacy as social practice: Using inquiry-based methods with marginalized learners. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 290 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Buffalo, 2016.

Language arts instructional practice provides a powerful classroom context for learning and can exert a profound effect on students' development of language and literacy skills. The literacy achievement gap creates a much needed urgency for developing pedagogical repertoires to improve access to literacy and language skills. There is a need for research that provides insights about the funds of knowledge and discourses that youths can draw from, to better assist teachers in constructing classroom spaces that connect in- and out of school literacies. In this qualitative research study, I attempted to understand and describe what happened with the implementation of a program pilot, designed to relate and integrate language arts content with practices that promote dialogic interactions in student-centered, socially situated applications. In particular, I explored how a dialogical and inquiry-based pedagogy, impacted both language learning and relationships with students having experienced significant life traumas and academic disenfranchisement. Finally, I wanted to observe language interactions in the context of social relationships and how that bears upon learning. Theories on the sociocultural aspects of literacy and learning (Kramsch, 2009; Kostogris, 2002, Ivanic, 2004; Behizadeh, 2014), including dialogism (Bakhtin, 1981; Alexander, 2005) and inquiry-based learning (Towns & Sweetland, 2008; Darling-Hammond, 2008), guided the design and methodology for this study.

ISBN: 9781339480879Subjects--Topical Terms:

684418
Curriculum development.

Literacy as social practice: Using inquiry-based methods with marginalized learners.
LDR:04040nmm a2200325 4500 001 2122218
005 20170912094015.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339480879
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10013541
035 $a AAI10013541
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Latona, Susan A. $3 3284185
245 1 0 $a Literacy as social practice: Using inquiry-based methods with marginalized learners.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 290 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Vladimir Ageyev.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Buffalo, 2016.
520 $a Language arts instructional practice provides a powerful classroom context for learning and can exert a profound effect on students' development of language and literacy skills. The literacy achievement gap creates a much needed urgency for developing pedagogical repertoires to improve access to literacy and language skills. There is a need for research that provides insights about the funds of knowledge and discourses that youths can draw from, to better assist teachers in constructing classroom spaces that connect in- and out of school literacies. In this qualitative research study, I attempted to understand and describe what happened with the implementation of a program pilot, designed to relate and integrate language arts content with practices that promote dialogic interactions in student-centered, socially situated applications. In particular, I explored how a dialogical and inquiry-based pedagogy, impacted both language learning and relationships with students having experienced significant life traumas and academic disenfranchisement. Finally, I wanted to observe language interactions in the context of social relationships and how that bears upon learning. Theories on the sociocultural aspects of literacy and learning (Kramsch, 2009; Kostogris, 2002, Ivanic, 2004; Behizadeh, 2014), including dialogism (Bakhtin, 1981; Alexander, 2005) and inquiry-based learning (Towns & Sweetland, 2008; Darling-Hammond, 2008), guided the design and methodology for this study.
520 $a This study was conducted over a 12 month period in a rural elementary school. The site was a BOCES (Board of Cooperative Educational Services) 6:1:1 classroom setting. There were six students in the classroom; three were the focus of this case study methodology. The classroom teacher was also a part of the case study analysis. Data for this study were collected through weekly classroom visits that were recorded and transcribed, field notes, interviews and student artifacts that related to the program implementation. The data was analyzed through qualitative coding that included a domain and taxonomic analysis (Miles & Huberman, 1994; Spradley, 1980) in order to identify emergent themes and categories. As became evident early in the study, and increasingly so as data collection and analysis progressed, was the significance identity and affiliative relationships had on student responses to learning initiatives.
520 $a The data revealed several factors. Of significance to student responses to language actions (reading, writing, speaking, listening etc.) were practices that involved identity reflection and exploration, affiliative relationships and connecting academic instruction to relevant and purposeful social learning experiences. The study resulted in the development of a model for a dialogic pedagogy that situates language and literacy as relational, and mediated through social experiences. Several implications for curriculum design, instructional relationships, instructional method and assessment were drawn from the findings of this study.
590 $a School code: 0656.
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0456
710 2 $a State University of New York at Buffalo. $b Learning and Instruction. $3 1026373
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-07A(E).
790 $a 0656
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10013541