語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Doors opening: An analysis of equity...
~
Williams, Elizabeth.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Doors opening: An analysis of equity and accessibility on public transportation services in the United States.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Doors opening: An analysis of equity and accessibility on public transportation services in the United States./
作者:
Williams, Elizabeth.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:
114 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International78-07A(E).
標題:
Sociology. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10253057
ISBN:
9781369463064
Doors opening: An analysis of equity and accessibility on public transportation services in the United States.
Williams, Elizabeth.
Doors opening: An analysis of equity and accessibility on public transportation services in the United States.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 114 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northeastern University, 2017.
Despite the essential role transportation plays in most people's daily lives, the ways in which our interactions and experiences with transportation systems affect our well-being is often overlooked. Transportation is an issue more significant than the political battles over infrastructure and urban planning generally acknowledge. Existing research has shown that people's access to reliable, high-quality transportation options as well as the degree to which these options provide timely and convenient access to destinations of civic, social, educational, and recreational opportunity varies across race and income lines. As made clear through social science frameworks like social exclusion theory, these variations in accessibility can have significant consequences not only on individuals, but on entire communities. Despite the strong body of research that finds evidence of inequities in the degree to which people can use public transit services to access certain destinations, several questions have gone unanswered. Only a handful of analyses have sought to establish macro-level trends that tell us about overall social patterns regarding variations on the quality and utility of public transit service. Further, much of this work has failed to probe the sources of these variations or looked into the institutional drivers that might explain why some people have different experiences riding transit than others.
ISBN: 9781369463064Subjects--Topical Terms:
516174
Sociology.
Doors opening: An analysis of equity and accessibility on public transportation services in the United States.
LDR
:04616nmm a2200325 4500
001
2122146
005
20170912094007.5
008
180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781369463064
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10253057
035
$a
AAI10253057
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Williams, Elizabeth.
$3
3284102
245
1 0
$a
Doors opening: An analysis of equity and accessibility on public transportation services in the United States.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2017
300
$a
114 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Gordana Rabrenovic.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northeastern University, 2017.
520
$a
Despite the essential role transportation plays in most people's daily lives, the ways in which our interactions and experiences with transportation systems affect our well-being is often overlooked. Transportation is an issue more significant than the political battles over infrastructure and urban planning generally acknowledge. Existing research has shown that people's access to reliable, high-quality transportation options as well as the degree to which these options provide timely and convenient access to destinations of civic, social, educational, and recreational opportunity varies across race and income lines. As made clear through social science frameworks like social exclusion theory, these variations in accessibility can have significant consequences not only on individuals, but on entire communities. Despite the strong body of research that finds evidence of inequities in the degree to which people can use public transit services to access certain destinations, several questions have gone unanswered. Only a handful of analyses have sought to establish macro-level trends that tell us about overall social patterns regarding variations on the quality and utility of public transit service. Further, much of this work has failed to probe the sources of these variations or looked into the institutional drivers that might explain why some people have different experiences riding transit than others.
520
$a
This dissertation project is comprised of three empirical research articles that respond to these oversights by introducing a sociological lens to the study of public transportation services broadly, and destination accessibility research specifically. In the first paper, I generate and describe patterns of transit-based access to destinations of opportunity across twelve cities nationwide. In the second paper, I investigate the organizational elements native to transit agencies that have been shown to impact the effectiveness of public services and the degree to which users can reap their benefits. Finally, in the third paper, I evaluate the use and utility of traditional and alternative transportation planning paradigms for engendering robust accessibility outcomes. While the three analyses engage three unique research questions with their own theoretical foundation, hypotheses, and methodological technique, there is an overarching question that guides my analysis: how useful is public transportation service when it comes to actually meeting people's accessibility needs, and in what ways do public transit agencies themselves affect these accessibility outcomes?
520
$a
Results of this analysis demonstrates there are macro-level, observable differences in people's ability to use public transportation to access the places they need or want to go, and that particular elements of an agency's organizational structure do in fact impact the utility of transit to various destinations in ways that are both straightforward and complex across cities and between social groups. This work also demonstrates that although transportation-based planning initiatives are currently incorporated in transit agency planning standards and guidelines, the impact of this approach is limited. Collectively, results across the three studies provide solid evidence that the physical outcomes of transit systems are reflections of institutional conditions in transit agencies. In reinforcing the role and impact of public institutions for shaping social service delivery outcomes, this research is an important contribution to both urban sociology and urban transportation planning literatures.
590
$a
School code: 0160.
650
4
$a
Sociology.
$3
516174
650
4
$a
Transportation.
$3
555912
650
4
$a
Social research.
$3
2122687
690
$a
0626
690
$a
0709
690
$a
0344
710
2
$a
Northeastern University.
$b
Sociology.
$3
1020498
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
78-07A(E).
790
$a
0160
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2017
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10253057
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9332762
電子資源
01.外借(書)_YB
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入