Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Land in trust: Preserving farmland t...
~
Kulwicki, Victoria.
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Land in trust: Preserving farmland through easement and fee simple ownership in rural, suburban, and urban contexts.
Record Type:
Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Land in trust: Preserving farmland through easement and fee simple ownership in rural, suburban, and urban contexts./
Author:
Kulwicki, Victoria.
Published:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:
79 p.
Notes:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-05.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International55-05(E).
Subject:
Agriculture. -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10118672
ISBN:
9781339800011
Land in trust: Preserving farmland through easement and fee simple ownership in rural, suburban, and urban contexts.
Kulwicki, Victoria.
Land in trust: Preserving farmland through easement and fee simple ownership in rural, suburban, and urban contexts.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 79 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-05.
Thesis (M.A.)--Tufts University, 2016.
In the face of sprawling development, land trusts and Community Land Trusts (CLTs) have historically proven to be effective models through which to acquire and preserve agricultural landscapes. This research seeks to :identify the most common land acquisition processes used by trusts preserving agricultural land; evaluate the role of a trust's geographic context (whether urban, suburban/peri-urban, or rural) in determining the use of easements versus fee-simple ownership; and discuss the benefits and drawbacks of easements and fee-simple ownership. For the purpose of this study, 207 agricultural land trusts and CLTs responded to a survey regarding their acquisition methods. A combination of 10 trusts and experts in the field participated in follow-up interviews. This study determined that easement is the most-used acquisition technique, although it is more common in rural geographies. Fee-simple acquisition through donation proved to be most popular in urban areas. Interviewees agreed that easements are more appropriate in rural geographies with lower land values, whereas community and governmental relationships facilitate fee-simple acquisitions in urban spaces. In order to better support the work of land trusts and CLTs in conserving agricultural land, it is essential to understand the specific nature of the relationships that trusts are using to support their acquisition processes. Then, comprehensive strategies and city-and county-level policies can be created to foster these relationships and better support the work of trusts.
ISBN: 9781339800011Subjects--Topical Terms:
518588
Agriculture.
Land in trust: Preserving farmland through easement and fee simple ownership in rural, suburban, and urban contexts.
LDR
:02472nmm a2200289 4500
001
2120922
005
20170724102928.5
008
180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781339800011
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10118672
035
$a
AAI10118672
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Kulwicki, Victoria.
$3
3282890
245
1 0
$a
Land in trust: Preserving farmland through easement and fee simple ownership in rural, suburban, and urban contexts.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2016
300
$a
79 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-05.
500
$a
Adviser: Jonathan Witten.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)--Tufts University, 2016.
520
$a
In the face of sprawling development, land trusts and Community Land Trusts (CLTs) have historically proven to be effective models through which to acquire and preserve agricultural landscapes. This research seeks to :identify the most common land acquisition processes used by trusts preserving agricultural land; evaluate the role of a trust's geographic context (whether urban, suburban/peri-urban, or rural) in determining the use of easements versus fee-simple ownership; and discuss the benefits and drawbacks of easements and fee-simple ownership. For the purpose of this study, 207 agricultural land trusts and CLTs responded to a survey regarding their acquisition methods. A combination of 10 trusts and experts in the field participated in follow-up interviews. This study determined that easement is the most-used acquisition technique, although it is more common in rural geographies. Fee-simple acquisition through donation proved to be most popular in urban areas. Interviewees agreed that easements are more appropriate in rural geographies with lower land values, whereas community and governmental relationships facilitate fee-simple acquisitions in urban spaces. In order to better support the work of land trusts and CLTs in conserving agricultural land, it is essential to understand the specific nature of the relationships that trusts are using to support their acquisition processes. Then, comprehensive strategies and city-and county-level policies can be created to foster these relationships and better support the work of trusts.
590
$a
School code: 0234.
650
4
$a
Agriculture.
$3
518588
650
4
$a
Land use planning.
$3
2122760
690
$a
0473
690
$a
0536
710
2
$a
Tufts University.
$b
Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning.
$3
1019399
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
55-05(E).
790
$a
0234
791
$a
M.A.
792
$a
2016
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10118672
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9331539
電子資源
01.外借(書)_YB
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login