東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Resource development and mitigation:...

Tupling, Raymond W., Jr.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Resource development and mitigation: How mitigation policy mechanisms influence the ecological effectiveness and economic efficiency of public lands.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Resource development and mitigation: How mitigation policy mechanisms influence the ecological effectiveness and economic efficiency of public lands./
Author:	Tupling, Raymond W., Jr.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	61 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-02(E).
Subject:	Agricultural economics. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10163538
ISBN:	9781369182293

Resource development and mitigation: How mitigation policy mechanisms influence the ecological effectiveness and economic efficiency of public lands.
Tupling, Raymond W., Jr.

Resource development and mitigation: How mitigation policy mechanisms influence the ecological effectiveness and economic efficiency of public lands. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 61 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-02.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wyoming, 2016.

Public lands provide society with many private and public goods, such as opportunities for resource development and the provision of ecosystem services. Since development and ecosystem service provision are often in conflict, mitigation is commonly used to offset unavoidable losses in ecosystem services. Mitigation policies, which coarsely influence development and mitigation patterns on the landscape, are generally applied on a case-by-case basis for public lands in the west. As such, the extent to which different mitigation policies achieve their objectives is often debatable and context dependent. To better understand the potential implications of different mitigation policies (e.g., on-site vs. off-site and in-kind vs. out-of-kind), we use a numerical simulation model on a hypothetical landscape to examine how developers are likely to respond to different mitigation policies and how the mitigation policies ultimately influence the economic efficiency and ecological effectiveness of public lands. In our simulations the land use outcomes are more economically efficient and maintain the same ecological effectiveness when less restrictive mitigation policies are enforced. This implies that land managers can enforce less restrictive mitigation policies and allow developers to locate development and mitigation in the most efficient sites.

ISBN: 9781369182293Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172150
Agricultural economics.

Resource development and mitigation: How mitigation policy mechanisms influence the ecological effectiveness and economic efficiency of public lands.
LDR:02316nmm a2200289 4500 001 2120598
005 20170724080046.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369182293
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10163538
035 $a AAI10163538
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Tupling, Raymond W., Jr. $3 3282542
245 1 0 $a Resource development and mitigation: How mitigation policy mechanisms influence the ecological effectiveness and economic efficiency of public lands.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 61 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-02.
500 $a Adviser: Benjamin S. Rashford.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wyoming, 2016.
520 $a Public lands provide society with many private and public goods, such as opportunities for resource development and the provision of ecosystem services. Since development and ecosystem service provision are often in conflict, mitigation is commonly used to offset unavoidable losses in ecosystem services. Mitigation policies, which coarsely influence development and mitigation patterns on the landscape, are generally applied on a case-by-case basis for public lands in the west. As such, the extent to which different mitigation policies achieve their objectives is often debatable and context dependent. To better understand the potential implications of different mitigation policies (e.g., on-site vs. off-site and in-kind vs. out-of-kind), we use a numerical simulation model on a hypothetical landscape to examine how developers are likely to respond to different mitigation policies and how the mitigation policies ultimately influence the economic efficiency and ecological effectiveness of public lands. In our simulations the land use outcomes are more economically efficient and maintain the same ecological effectiveness when less restrictive mitigation policies are enforced. This implies that land managers can enforce less restrictive mitigation policies and allow developers to locate development and mitigation in the most efficient sites.
590 $a School code: 0264.
650 4 $a Agricultural economics. $3 3172150
650 4 $a Economics. $3 517137
690 $a 0503
690 $a 0501
710 2 $a University of Wyoming. $b Agricultural and Applied Economics. $3 3172442
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-02(E).
790 $a 0264
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10163538