東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Indigenous autonomy and well-being: ...

Foxworth, Raymond.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Indigenous autonomy and well-being: Resources, participation and institutions.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Indigenous autonomy and well-being: Resources, participation and institutions./
作者:	Foxworth, Raymond.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	220 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-01A(E).
標題:	Social research. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3721805
ISBN:	9781339035727

Indigenous autonomy and well-being: Resources, participation and institutions.
Foxworth, Raymond.

Indigenous autonomy and well-being: Resources, participation and institutions. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 220 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Boulder, 2015.

What are the effects of indigenous political autonomy on the well-being of indigenous peoples? There has been a growing literature documenting the persistent patterns of underdevelopment and poverty in indigenous communities globally. At the same time, we have witnessed indigenous groups worldwide emerged to demand the right to autonomy and collective land rights. Does devolving decision-making power to indigenous communities improve the lives and well-being of indigenous peoples?

ISBN: 9781339035727Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122687
Social research.

Indigenous autonomy and well-being: Resources, participation and institutions.
LDR:03712nmm a2200301 4500 001 2119854
005 20170622092923.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339035727
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3721805
035 $a AAI3721805
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Foxworth, Raymond. $3 3281750
245 1 0 $a Indigenous autonomy and well-being: Resources, participation and institutions.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 220 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Carew Boulding.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Boulder, 2015.
520 $a What are the effects of indigenous political autonomy on the well-being of indigenous peoples? There has been a growing literature documenting the persistent patterns of underdevelopment and poverty in indigenous communities globally. At the same time, we have witnessed indigenous groups worldwide emerged to demand the right to autonomy and collective land rights. Does devolving decision-making power to indigenous communities improve the lives and well-being of indigenous peoples?
520 $a There literature on indigenous autonomy and political outcomes has largely followed two schools of thought that I label the "Activists" and the "Critics." Activists have suggested that indigenous autonomy is a means to initiate a host of positive outcomes in indigenous communities. These activists have suggested that acknowledging and recognizing indigenous autonomy will lead to greater indigenous economic and social development, more engaged citizens, and accountable politicians. But critics of indigenous autonomy, largely academics who have tried to gain empirical leverage on the outcomes of autonomy, suggest that under autonomy, bad things happen in indigenous communities. The most damming of these arguments has suggested that indigenous communities actually resemble authoritarian enclaves---local spaces where vestiges of authoritarianism rule beyond the reach of democracy.
520 $a Using new and original data from across Panama, Mexico and the United States, and a variety of statistical methods, I enter this debate and examine the conditions under which autonomy is more likely to lead to positive changes in indigenous well-being. In all, I argue that indigenous autonomy has a robust and positive effect on indigenous well-being. But the overall effect of autonomy on altering indigenous well-being is conditioned on the following factors: the type of autonomy, political resources, participation and institutions. In all, I argue that there are certain conditions that make autonomy more effective. When indigenous autonomy forces ongoing interaction with the state, indigenous communities are able to check centralized power and gather state resources for local development. Moreover, when indigenous peoples engage in higher rates of political participation under autonomy, they are better able to draw resources from the state leading to greater local investment and improving well-being. Finally, I argue and find that under autonomy institutions also matter. When autonomy leads to the development of strong local institutional we are more likely to see better well-being outcomes for indigenous peoples. In all, my findings suggest that indigenous peoples and forms of organizations need to be engaged and empowered to overcome the perennial poverty in indigenous communities.
590 $a School code: 0051.
650 4 $a Social research. $3 2122687
690 $a 0344
710 2 $a University of Colorado at Boulder. $b Political Science. $3 1278267
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-01A(E).
790 $a 0051
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3721805