東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Do financial factors drive aggregate...

Pancost, Nathaniel Aaron.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Do financial factors drive aggregate productivity? Evidence from Indian manufacturing establishments.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Do financial factors drive aggregate productivity? Evidence from Indian manufacturing establishments./
作者:	Pancost, Nathaniel Aaron.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	138 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-05A(E).
標題:	Economics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10239458
ISBN:	9781369438550

Do financial factors drive aggregate productivity? Evidence from Indian manufacturing establishments.
Pancost, Nathaniel Aaron.

Do financial factors drive aggregate productivity? Evidence from Indian manufacturing establishments. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 138 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2016.

Numerous countries have implemented financial reforms in the past three decades, but how these reforms affect economic growth has not been established. I develop a novel dynamic equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms and endogenous leverage to isolate the effects of changing financial frictions on economic growth. Changes in financial frictions affect aggregate productivity by shifting the allocation of resources across firms. However, common shocks to productivity unrelated to finance also change the allocation of resources across firms, because more-productive firms respond to shocks by changing leverage. I show using plant-level microdata from India that although difference in difference regressions and aggregate productivity decompositions suggest that financial reforms have led to economic growth in India since 1990, I can generate the same patterns in my calibrated model with only common shocks to productivity. In addition, when I calibrate a model to match the dynamic evolution of the size-productivity distribution in India, I find that financial factors explain 71% of Indian labor productivity growth from 1990 to 1995, but only 2%--8% from 1995 to 2011. My work suggests that factors that affect productivity within firms are more important determinants of aggregate productivity growth than financial development, and might explain why developing economies lag behind the United States in growth and productivity.

ISBN: 9781369438550Subjects--Topical Terms:

517137
Economics.

Do financial factors drive aggregate productivity? Evidence from Indian manufacturing establishments.
LDR:02402nmm a2200301 4500 001 2118564
005 20170612074623.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369438550
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10239458
035 $a AAI10239458
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Pancost, Nathaniel Aaron. $3 3280407
245 1 0 $a Do financial factors drive aggregate productivity? Evidence from Indian manufacturing establishments.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 138 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Lars P. Hansen.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2016.
520 $a Numerous countries have implemented financial reforms in the past three decades, but how these reforms affect economic growth has not been established. I develop a novel dynamic equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms and endogenous leverage to isolate the effects of changing financial frictions on economic growth. Changes in financial frictions affect aggregate productivity by shifting the allocation of resources across firms. However, common shocks to productivity unrelated to finance also change the allocation of resources across firms, because more-productive firms respond to shocks by changing leverage. I show using plant-level microdata from India that although difference in difference regressions and aggregate productivity decompositions suggest that financial reforms have led to economic growth in India since 1990, I can generate the same patterns in my calibrated model with only common shocks to productivity. In addition, when I calibrate a model to match the dynamic evolution of the size-productivity distribution in India, I find that financial factors explain 71% of Indian labor productivity growth from 1990 to 1995, but only 2%--8% from 1995 to 2011. My work suggests that factors that affect productivity within firms are more important determinants of aggregate productivity growth than financial development, and might explain why developing economies lag behind the United States in growth and productivity.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Economics. $3 517137
650 4 $a Finance. $3 542899
650 4 $a Economic theory. $3 1556984
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0511
710 2 $a The University of Chicago. $b Business and Economics. $3 2098350
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-05A(E).
790 $a 0330
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10239458