東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Motivation in interaction: A convers...

Burch, Alfred Rue.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Motivation in interaction: A conversation-analytic perspective.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Motivation in interaction: A conversation-analytic perspective./
Author:	Burch, Alfred Rue.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	329 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-05A(E).
Subject:	Language. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10300241
ISBN:	9781369422801

Motivation in interaction: A conversation-analytic perspective.
Burch, Alfred Rue.

Motivation in interaction: A conversation-analytic perspective. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 329 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 2016.

Over the past decade, the field of L2 motivation research has begun to turn its focus toward what Dornyei and Ushioda (2010) have termed "socio-complexity" approaches, following recent trends in the wider field of SLA that incorporate discursive and usage-based methodologies (Atkinson, 2011; Cadierno & Eskildsen, 2015; Firth & Wagner, 1997; 2007; Ortega, 2013). These socio-complexity approaches, including Ushioda's (2009) "person-in-context" perspective, Dornyei's (2005; 2009) "L2 motivation self system" and various Complexity/ Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST) approaches (Dornyei, 2014; Dornyei, MacIntyre & Henry, 2015; MacIntyre, 2012; MacIntyre & Legatto, 2011), though eclectic in focus and methodology, have all begun to step away from the assumptions of context as background variable and individual differences as psychological traits that have dominated much of the previous L2 motivation research, to instead view motivation as dynamically changing and socially contextualized on multiple timescales, and more importantly, have come to recognize that "L2 learner" is just one of many potentially relevant situated identities (Zimmerman, 1998) for those interacting in their L2s (Firth & Wagner, 1997; Ushioda, 2009).

ISBN: 9781369422801Subjects--Topical Terms:

643551
Language.

Motivation in interaction: A conversation-analytic perspective.
LDR:04402nmm a2200325 4500 001 2118268
005 20170605151659.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369422801
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10300241
035 $a AAI10300241
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Burch, Alfred Rue. $3 3280091
245 1 0 $a Motivation in interaction: A conversation-analytic perspective.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 329 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Gabriele Kasper.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 2016.
520 $a Over the past decade, the field of L2 motivation research has begun to turn its focus toward what Dornyei and Ushioda (2010) have termed "socio-complexity" approaches, following recent trends in the wider field of SLA that incorporate discursive and usage-based methodologies (Atkinson, 2011; Cadierno & Eskildsen, 2015; Firth & Wagner, 1997; 2007; Ortega, 2013). These socio-complexity approaches, including Ushioda's (2009) "person-in-context" perspective, Dornyei's (2005; 2009) "L2 motivation self system" and various Complexity/ Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST) approaches (Dornyei, 2014; Dornyei, MacIntyre & Henry, 2015; MacIntyre, 2012; MacIntyre & Legatto, 2011), though eclectic in focus and methodology, have all begun to step away from the assumptions of context as background variable and individual differences as psychological traits that have dominated much of the previous L2 motivation research, to instead view motivation as dynamically changing and socially contextualized on multiple timescales, and more importantly, have come to recognize that "L2 learner" is just one of many potentially relevant situated identities (Zimmerman, 1998) for those interacting in their L2s (Firth & Wagner, 1997; Ushioda, 2009).
520 $a This study contributes to this dynamic and contextualized perspective at the interactional time scale by utilizing EMCA (Ethnomethodology/Conversation Analysis) as it has been applied to second language acquisition (or CA-SLA; see Kasper & Wagner, 2011; 2014)---including sequential analysis (Schegloff, 2007), membership categorization analysis (Fitzgerald & Housley, 2015; Stokoe, 2012), discursive psychology (Edwards & Potter, 1992; 2005) and a focus on embodied interaction (Streeck, Goodwin & LeBaron, 2011)---to analyze mundane Japanese as a Second Language interactions. The data follows Peony, an L2 speaker of Japanese, in video recordings of interactions between her and her L1 speaking friends and family collected over the course of 13 months. The analysis focuses on the actions and interactional projects that Peony and her co-participants undertake and co-construct, and takes into account the linguistic, embodied, and material resources that they employ, in order to develop a perspective that focuses on motivation as socially viewable, accountable, and accomplished.
520 $a In particular, this study focuses on three aspects of motivation-in-interaction: 1) persistence, or the sustained orientation (often through interactional difficulty) toward an interactional goal, 2) initiative , or engagement and participation at points where it would not be noticeably absent or accountable to not engage, and 3) motivation as topic, focusing on Peony's self-assessments of her Japanese ability and her accounts regarding the efforts she makes towards studying the language. The analysis reveals that while there are indeed times that Peony's effort is oriented toward specific learning objects, much of her effort is exerted towards other situated identities such as being an attentive friend or family member. Furthermore, the sequential nature of persistence and engagement, and Peony's relationships with her co-participants on one hand, and the relationships with others that are invoked in her conversations, with their concomitant category bound rights and obligations on the other, make clear that motivation at the interactional level is very much a matter of mundane morality (Jayussi, 1984; 1991).
590 $a School code: 0085.
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Foreign language education. $3 3172512
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0444
710 2 $a University of Hawai'i at Manoa. $b Second Language Studies. $3 2098785
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-05A(E).
790 $a 0085
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10300241