語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
The Russian constructivist "object" ...
~
Kiaer, Christina Hilleboe.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
The Russian constructivist "object" and the revolutionizing of everyday life, 1921-1929.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
The Russian constructivist "object" and the revolutionizing of everyday life, 1921-1929./
作者:
Kiaer, Christina Hilleboe.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 1995,
面頁冊數:
409 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-03, Section: A, page: 8980.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International57-03A.
標題:
Art history. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9621216
The Russian constructivist "object" and the revolutionizing of everyday life, 1921-1929.
Kiaer, Christina Hilleboe.
The Russian constructivist "object" and the revolutionizing of everyday life, 1921-1929.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 1995 - 409 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-03, Section: A, page: 8980.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 1995.
In 1921, the Russian constructivist artists declared that they could best contribute to the new Soviet state by abandoning avant-garde painting and sculpture entirely in favor of entering into industry to produce utilitarian objects for use in everyday life. This declaration was not only avant-garde sloganizing, but a deliberate intervention into the contemporary Soviet campaign for the formation of a "new everyday life" (novyi byt) after the Revolution. The constructivists imagined a socialist "object" that would foster the identity of a new Soviet subject: it would encompass the individual desires organized by the commodity fetish, even as its Marxist goal was to construct new, transparent relations between subject and object that would lead to collective utopia. The "productivist" rhetoric of constructivism paradoxically resulted in a profound engagement with consumption in the context of the hybrid consumer culture produced by the semi-capitalist economy of the New Economic Policy (NEP) of 1921-1928. Chapter One examines the tension between the visual and the material in constructivist theory through an analysis of Vladimir Tatlin's anti-aesthetic utilitarian objects and the agitational optics of Varvara Stepanova's textile designs, both of 1924. Chapter Two theorizes the "active" socialist object as a fetish endowed with social agency, through a case study of the state enterprise Mossel'prom, for which Aleksandr Rodchenko mass-produced advertisements and packaging in 1923-25. Chapter Three questions the socialist object's relation to the capitalist commodity through an analysis of Rodchenko's letters home from Paris in 1925 and the famous Workers' Club that he built there. Chapter Four argues that the gradual demise of NEP beginning in 1926 eliminated the economic context that made the constructivist object viable, and constructivist beliefs in the consumer object as a key to the formation of Soviet subjects were redirected toward other forms: Sergei Tret'iakov's eugenic play I Want a Child of 1926-29, for which El Lissitzky designed the sets, continues constructivist metaphors of production and consumption, and the fetishized photographic object replaces the material object as fetish in Rodchenko's photography of the later 1920s.Subjects--Topical Terms:
2122701
Art history.
The Russian constructivist "object" and the revolutionizing of everyday life, 1921-1929.
LDR
:03181nmm a2200277 4500
001
2117607
005
20170530090103.5
008
180830s1995 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI9621216
035
$a
AAI9621216
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Kiaer, Christina Hilleboe.
$3
3279387
245
1 4
$a
The Russian constructivist "object" and the revolutionizing of everyday life, 1921-1929.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
1995
300
$a
409 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-03, Section: A, page: 8980.
500
$a
Chair: Timothy J. Clark.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 1995.
520
$a
In 1921, the Russian constructivist artists declared that they could best contribute to the new Soviet state by abandoning avant-garde painting and sculpture entirely in favor of entering into industry to produce utilitarian objects for use in everyday life. This declaration was not only avant-garde sloganizing, but a deliberate intervention into the contemporary Soviet campaign for the formation of a "new everyday life" (novyi byt) after the Revolution. The constructivists imagined a socialist "object" that would foster the identity of a new Soviet subject: it would encompass the individual desires organized by the commodity fetish, even as its Marxist goal was to construct new, transparent relations between subject and object that would lead to collective utopia. The "productivist" rhetoric of constructivism paradoxically resulted in a profound engagement with consumption in the context of the hybrid consumer culture produced by the semi-capitalist economy of the New Economic Policy (NEP) of 1921-1928. Chapter One examines the tension between the visual and the material in constructivist theory through an analysis of Vladimir Tatlin's anti-aesthetic utilitarian objects and the agitational optics of Varvara Stepanova's textile designs, both of 1924. Chapter Two theorizes the "active" socialist object as a fetish endowed with social agency, through a case study of the state enterprise Mossel'prom, for which Aleksandr Rodchenko mass-produced advertisements and packaging in 1923-25. Chapter Three questions the socialist object's relation to the capitalist commodity through an analysis of Rodchenko's letters home from Paris in 1925 and the famous Workers' Club that he built there. Chapter Four argues that the gradual demise of NEP beginning in 1926 eliminated the economic context that made the constructivist object viable, and constructivist beliefs in the consumer object as a key to the formation of Soviet subjects were redirected toward other forms: Sergei Tret'iakov's eugenic play I Want a Child of 1926-29, for which El Lissitzky designed the sets, continues constructivist metaphors of production and consumption, and the fetishized photographic object replaces the material object as fetish in Rodchenko's photography of the later 1920s.
590
$a
School code: 0028.
650
4
$a
Art history.
$3
2122701
650
4
$a
European history.
$2
bicssc
$3
1972904
690
$a
0377
690
$a
0335
710
2
$a
University of California, Berkeley.
$3
687832
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
57-03A.
790
$a
0028
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
1995
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9621216
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9328225
電子資源
01.外借(書)_YB
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入