東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Determination of antibiotic, beta-ag...

Bowling, Mitchell Brett.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Determination of antibiotic, beta-agonist, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug residues in ground beef from USDA certified organic, natural, conventional, and market cow and bull sources.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Determination of antibiotic, beta-agonist, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug residues in ground beef from USDA certified organic, natural, conventional, and market cow and bull sources./
作者:	Bowling, Mitchell Brett.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2009,
面頁冊數:	87 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-03, Section: B, page: 1402.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-03B.
標題:	Animal sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3401020
ISBN:	9781109677560

Determination of antibiotic, beta-agonist, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug residues in ground beef from USDA certified organic, natural, conventional, and market cow and bull sources.
Bowling, Mitchell Brett.

Determination of antibiotic, beta-agonist, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug residues in ground beef from USDA certified organic, natural, conventional, and market cow and bull sources. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2009 - 87 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-03, Section: B, page: 1402.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Colorado State University, 2009.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

In recent years, consumer demand for organic and "natural" products has increased, partly due to a perception that such products are healthier and contain fewer additives, including veterinary drugs and growth promotants. The study presented herein compared occurrence of veterinary drug residues in ground beef samples reflecting different livestock production classifications. We collected ground beef samples (N = 400) consisting of 90.0 +/- 4.0% lean muscle tissue from a total of eight plants, two each reflecting production in the following categories: (1) USDA Certified Organic (n = 100); (2) USDA Process Verified Never Ever 3 (n =1 00); (3) conventionally raised fed beef (n = 100); and (4) ground beef derived from carcasses of market cows and bulls (n = 100). Liquid chromatography coupled with triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) methods were developed for the following veterinary drugs: (1) Aminoglycosides (Gentamicin, Amikacin, and Neomycin); (2) beta-lactams (Penicillin, Ampicillin, and Desfuroylceftiofur); (3) Fluoroquinolones (Danofloxacin and Ciprofloxacin); (4) Macrolides (Erythromycin, Tylosin, and Tilmicosin); (5) Phenicols (Florfenicol); (6) Sulfonamides (Sulfamethazine and Sulfadimethoxine,); (7) Tetracyclines (Oxytetracycline, Chlortetracycline, and Tetracycline); (8) Streptogramins (Virginiamycin); (9) beta-agonists (Ractopamine and Zilpaterol); and (10) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Flunixin and Phenylbutazone). Residues exceeding their respective US tolerance limit were found in six ground beef samples. Two USDA Certified Organic samples contained Ampicillin residues exceeding US tolerance limits. One USDA Process Verified Never Ever 3 sample contained a residue of Ractopamine exceeding US tolerance limits. One sample from the market cow and bull category contained a residue of Sulfadimethoxine that exceeded US tolerance limits, one contained a residue of Ampicillin that exceeded US tolerance limits, and one contained a residue of Phenylbutazone that exceeded US tolerance limits. Residues of Phenylbutazone exceeding US tolerance limits were also found in one sample from the conventional production category. Additionally, residues (below the US tolerance limit) of several classes of veterinary drugs were found in samples from the USDA Certified Organic and USDA Process Verified Never Ever 3 production categories, a finding that clearly demonstrates violation of zero-tolerance statutes set forth by the National Organic Program and USDA Process Verified Never Ever 3 marketing descriptors. In the USDA Certified Organic production category, residues were detected in eight Ampicillin, seven Penicillin, three Sulfamethazine, one Sulfadimethoxine, and one Ractopamine sample. In the USDA Process Verified Never Ever 3 production category, residues were detected in one Ampicillin, one Chlortetracycline, two Tetracycline, and six Ractopamine samples. These violations exceed the historical prevalence of veterinary drug residues reported by the National Residue Program and demonstrate the need for careful monitoring of animals administered veterinary drugs in order to prevent improper inclusion of unqualified animals in premium marketing programs, such as USDA Certified Organic and USDA Process Verified Never Ever 3 programs.

ISBN: 9781109677560Subjects--Topical Terms:

3174829
Animal sciences.

Determination of antibiotic, beta-agonist, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug residues in ground beef from USDA certified organic, natural, conventional, and market cow and bull sources.
LDR:04395nmm a2200289 4500 001 2116895
005 20170508094351.5
008 180830s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109677560
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3401020
035 $a AAI3401020
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bowling, Mitchell Brett. $3 3278643
245 1 0 $a Determination of antibiotic, beta-agonist, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug residues in ground beef from USDA certified organic, natural, conventional, and market cow and bull sources.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2009
300 $a 87 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-03, Section: B, page: 1402.
500 $a Adviser: Keith E. Belk.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Colorado State University, 2009.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
520 $a In recent years, consumer demand for organic and "natural" products has increased, partly due to a perception that such products are healthier and contain fewer additives, including veterinary drugs and growth promotants. The study presented herein compared occurrence of veterinary drug residues in ground beef samples reflecting different livestock production classifications. We collected ground beef samples (N = 400) consisting of 90.0 +/- 4.0% lean muscle tissue from a total of eight plants, two each reflecting production in the following categories: (1) USDA Certified Organic (n = 100); (2) USDA Process Verified Never Ever 3 (n =1 00); (3) conventionally raised fed beef (n = 100); and (4) ground beef derived from carcasses of market cows and bulls (n = 100). Liquid chromatography coupled with triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) methods were developed for the following veterinary drugs: (1) Aminoglycosides (Gentamicin, Amikacin, and Neomycin); (2) beta-lactams (Penicillin, Ampicillin, and Desfuroylceftiofur); (3) Fluoroquinolones (Danofloxacin and Ciprofloxacin); (4) Macrolides (Erythromycin, Tylosin, and Tilmicosin); (5) Phenicols (Florfenicol); (6) Sulfonamides (Sulfamethazine and Sulfadimethoxine,); (7) Tetracyclines (Oxytetracycline, Chlortetracycline, and Tetracycline); (8) Streptogramins (Virginiamycin); (9) beta-agonists (Ractopamine and Zilpaterol); and (10) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Flunixin and Phenylbutazone). Residues exceeding their respective US tolerance limit were found in six ground beef samples. Two USDA Certified Organic samples contained Ampicillin residues exceeding US tolerance limits. One USDA Process Verified Never Ever 3 sample contained a residue of Ractopamine exceeding US tolerance limits. One sample from the market cow and bull category contained a residue of Sulfadimethoxine that exceeded US tolerance limits, one contained a residue of Ampicillin that exceeded US tolerance limits, and one contained a residue of Phenylbutazone that exceeded US tolerance limits. Residues of Phenylbutazone exceeding US tolerance limits were also found in one sample from the conventional production category. Additionally, residues (below the US tolerance limit) of several classes of veterinary drugs were found in samples from the USDA Certified Organic and USDA Process Verified Never Ever 3 production categories, a finding that clearly demonstrates violation of zero-tolerance statutes set forth by the National Organic Program and USDA Process Verified Never Ever 3 marketing descriptors. In the USDA Certified Organic production category, residues were detected in eight Ampicillin, seven Penicillin, three Sulfamethazine, one Sulfadimethoxine, and one Ractopamine sample. In the USDA Process Verified Never Ever 3 production category, residues were detected in one Ampicillin, one Chlortetracycline, two Tetracycline, and six Ractopamine samples. These violations exceed the historical prevalence of veterinary drug residues reported by the National Residue Program and demonstrate the need for careful monitoring of animals administered veterinary drugs in order to prevent improper inclusion of unqualified animals in premium marketing programs, such as USDA Certified Organic and USDA Process Verified Never Ever 3 programs.
590 $a School code: 0053.
650 4 $a Animal sciences. $3 3174829
690 $a 0475
710 2 $a Colorado State University. $3 675646
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-03B.
790 $a 0053
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3401020