東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Mitigation of Earthquake-Induced Soi...

O'Donnell, Sean.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Mitigation of Earthquake-Induced Soil Liquefaction via Microbial Denitrification: A Two-Stage Process.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Mitigation of Earthquake-Induced Soil Liquefaction via Microbial Denitrification: A Two-Stage Process./
作者:	O'Donnell, Sean.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	191 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-10B(E).
標題:	Civil engineering. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10109455
ISBN:	9781339727400

Mitigation of Earthquake-Induced Soil Liquefaction via Microbial Denitrification: A Two-Stage Process.
O'Donnell, Sean.

Mitigation of Earthquake-Induced Soil Liquefaction via Microbial Denitrification: A Two-Stage Process. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 191 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2016.

The dissimilatory reduction of nitrate, or denitrification, offers the potential of a sustainable, cost effective method for the non-disruptive mitigation of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction. Worldwide, trillions of dollars of infrastructure are at risk for liquefaction damage in earthquake prone regions. However, most techniques for remediating liquefiable soils are either not applicable to sites near existing infrastructure, or are prohibitively expensive. Recently, laboratory studies have shown the potential for biogeotechnical soil improvement techniques such as microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) to mitigate liquefaction potential in a non-disruptive manner. Multiple microbial processes have been identified for MICP, but only two have been extensively studied. Ureolysis, the most commonly studied process for MICP, has been shown to quickly and efficiently induce carbonate precipitation on particle surfaces and at particle contacts to improve the stiffness, strength, and dilatant behavior of liquefiable soils. However, ureolysis also produces copious amounts of ammonium, a potentially toxic byproduct. The second process studied for MICP, denitrification, has been shown to precipitate carbonate, and hence improve soil properties, much more slowly than ureolysis. However, the byproducts of denitrification, nitrogen and carbon dioxide gas, are non-toxic, and present the added benefit of rapidly desaturating the treated soil. Small amounts of desaturation have been shown to increase the cyclic resistance, and hence the liquefaction resistance, of liquefiable soils. So, denitrification offers the potential to mitigate liquefaction as a two-stage process, with desaturation providing short term mitigation, and MICP providing long term liquefaction resistance. This study presents the results of soil testing, stoichiometric modeling, and microbial ecology characterization to better characterize the potential use of denitrification as a two-stage process for liquefaction mitigation.

ISBN: 9781339727400Subjects--Topical Terms:

860360
Civil engineering.

Mitigation of Earthquake-Induced Soil Liquefaction via Microbial Denitrification: A Two-Stage Process.
LDR:02992nmm a2200301 4500 001 2116697
005 20170508081317.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339727400
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10109455
035 $a AAI10109455
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a O'Donnell, Sean. $3 3278435
245 1 0 $a Mitigation of Earthquake-Induced Soil Liquefaction via Microbial Denitrification: A Two-Stage Process.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 191 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Edward Kavazanjian.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2016.
520 $a The dissimilatory reduction of nitrate, or denitrification, offers the potential of a sustainable, cost effective method for the non-disruptive mitigation of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction. Worldwide, trillions of dollars of infrastructure are at risk for liquefaction damage in earthquake prone regions. However, most techniques for remediating liquefiable soils are either not applicable to sites near existing infrastructure, or are prohibitively expensive. Recently, laboratory studies have shown the potential for biogeotechnical soil improvement techniques such as microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) to mitigate liquefaction potential in a non-disruptive manner. Multiple microbial processes have been identified for MICP, but only two have been extensively studied. Ureolysis, the most commonly studied process for MICP, has been shown to quickly and efficiently induce carbonate precipitation on particle surfaces and at particle contacts to improve the stiffness, strength, and dilatant behavior of liquefiable soils. However, ureolysis also produces copious amounts of ammonium, a potentially toxic byproduct. The second process studied for MICP, denitrification, has been shown to precipitate carbonate, and hence improve soil properties, much more slowly than ureolysis. However, the byproducts of denitrification, nitrogen and carbon dioxide gas, are non-toxic, and present the added benefit of rapidly desaturating the treated soil. Small amounts of desaturation have been shown to increase the cyclic resistance, and hence the liquefaction resistance, of liquefiable soils. So, denitrification offers the potential to mitigate liquefaction as a two-stage process, with desaturation providing short term mitigation, and MICP providing long term liquefaction resistance. This study presents the results of soil testing, stoichiometric modeling, and microbial ecology characterization to better characterize the potential use of denitrification as a two-stage process for liquefaction mitigation.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Civil engineering. $3 860360
650 4 $a Environmental engineering. $3 548583
650 4 $a Geotechnology. $3 1018558
690 $a 0543
690 $a 0775
690 $a 0428
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Civil and Environmental Engineering. $3 1676561
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-10B(E).
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10109455