東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The bureaucratic mentality in democr...

Hudson, Jennifer M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The bureaucratic mentality in democratic theory and contemporary democracy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The bureaucratic mentality in democratic theory and contemporary democracy./
作者:	Hudson, Jennifer M.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	243 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-04A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10164887
ISBN:	9781369193015

The bureaucratic mentality in democratic theory and contemporary democracy.
Hudson, Jennifer M.

The bureaucratic mentality in democratic theory and contemporary democracy. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 243 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.

This project draws attention to a contemporary exaltation of competence and swift decision-making that emphasizes the moment of executive power in democratic political practice and within democratic theory. Drawing on Weber's concept of rationalization and his opposition between the mentalities of the official and the politician, I develop a distinct conception of bureaucracy as a mode of thought. Bureaucratic thinking involves the application of technical knowledge and skills, with a claim to universality and objectivity, in order to produce results and promote consensus and social harmony. I argue that this conception allows us to better recognize the contemporary diffusion of a flexible, decentralized type of bureaucracy and situate it within the history of affinity and tension between bureaucratic and democratic principles. I focus on a tradition within continental democratic theory, which tends to downplay politics by replacing it with administration and regulation. French political theorist and historian Pierre Rosanvallon is its contemporary representative, building on Hegel and Durkheim as well as Saint-Simon and Leon Duguit. Initially, Rosanvallon offered a theory of participation and democratic legitimacy that would work within the administrative state, taking into account his own strong critiques of bureaucracy. I argue that significant shifts evident in his later works, which respond to new realities, explicitly and/or implicitly mobilize bureaucratic thinking and practice to buttress democratic legitimacy within the nation-state and the European Union. I then play Rosanvallon's earlier anti-bureaucratic arguments against his modified position in order to argue against attempts to reconcile bureaucracy and democracy, understood in its procedural form with equal freedom at its core. My claim is that bureaucratic thinking aims at consensus, encourages passivity, undermines the democratic value of political equality, and obscures values and interests behind policy decisions that are presented as neutral, technical, and fact-based. Methodologically, I use the history of ideas to develop the concept of the bureaucratic mentality, tracing it through the work of exemplary thinkers from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, including Hegel, Durkheim, and Weber.

ISBN: 9781369193015Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

The bureaucratic mentality in democratic theory and contemporary democracy.
LDR:03241nmm a2200301 4500 001 2116642
005 20170515070753.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369193015
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10164887
035 $a AAI10164887
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hudson, Jennifer M. $3 3278379
245 1 4 $a The bureaucratic mentality in democratic theory and contemporary democracy.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 243 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Nadia Urbinati.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.
520 $a This project draws attention to a contemporary exaltation of competence and swift decision-making that emphasizes the moment of executive power in democratic political practice and within democratic theory. Drawing on Weber's concept of rationalization and his opposition between the mentalities of the official and the politician, I develop a distinct conception of bureaucracy as a mode of thought. Bureaucratic thinking involves the application of technical knowledge and skills, with a claim to universality and objectivity, in order to produce results and promote consensus and social harmony. I argue that this conception allows us to better recognize the contemporary diffusion of a flexible, decentralized type of bureaucracy and situate it within the history of affinity and tension between bureaucratic and democratic principles. I focus on a tradition within continental democratic theory, which tends to downplay politics by replacing it with administration and regulation. French political theorist and historian Pierre Rosanvallon is its contemporary representative, building on Hegel and Durkheim as well as Saint-Simon and Leon Duguit. Initially, Rosanvallon offered a theory of participation and democratic legitimacy that would work within the administrative state, taking into account his own strong critiques of bureaucracy. I argue that significant shifts evident in his later works, which respond to new realities, explicitly and/or implicitly mobilize bureaucratic thinking and practice to buttress democratic legitimacy within the nation-state and the European Union. I then play Rosanvallon's earlier anti-bureaucratic arguments against his modified position in order to argue against attempts to reconcile bureaucracy and democracy, understood in its procedural form with equal freedom at its core. My claim is that bureaucratic thinking aims at consensus, encourages passivity, undermines the democratic value of political equality, and obscures values and interests behind policy decisions that are presented as neutral, technical, and fact-based. Methodologically, I use the history of ideas to develop the concept of the bureaucratic mentality, tracing it through the work of exemplary thinkers from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, including Hegel, Durkheim, and Weber.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Modern history. $3 2122829
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0582
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Political Science. $3 1677427
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-04A(E).
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10164887